Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2025
Electrode Positioning and Montage in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
Published on: May 23, 2011
Effects of Hypnotic Analgesia and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Pain Tolerance and Corticospinal
Bruno Schein1,2, Gerardo Beltran1,2,3, Bárbara Regina França1,2
1Post-Graduate Program in Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul (RS), Brazil.
Objective:
We compare the effect of HAS, a-tDCS on the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (l-DLPFC), and rest-testing on pain measures [(cold pressor test (CPT) (primary outcome) and heat pain threshold]. We also compare their effects on the motor evoked potential (MEP) (primary outcome), short intracortical inhibition (SICI), intracortical facilitation (ICF), and cortical silent period (CSP).
Methods:
This randomized, blind, crossover trial included 18 women with fibromyalgia, aged from 18 to 65 years old. They received at random and in a crossover order a-tDCS over the l-DLPFC (2mA), HAS, or a rest-testing.
Results:
HAS compared to a-tDCS increased the pain tolerance with a moderate effect size (ES) [Cohen's f=-0.78; (CI 95%; -1.48 to -0.12)]. While compared to rest-testing, HAS increased the CPT with a large ES [Cohen's f=-0.87; (CI 95%; -1.84 to -0.09)]. The a-tDCS compared to HAS increased the MEP amplitude with large ES [Cohen's f=-1.73 (CI 95%; -2.17 to -0.17)]. Likewise, its ES compared to rest-testing in the MEP size was large [Cohen's f=-1.03; (CI 95%; -2.06 to -0.08)].
Conclusion:
These findings revealed that HAS affects contra-regulating mechanisms involved in perception and pain tolerance, while the a-tDCS increased the excitability of the corticospinal pathways. They give a subsidy to investigate their effect as approaches to counter regulate the maladaptive neuroplasticity involved in fibromyalgia.
Clinical Trial Registration:
www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier - NCT05066568.
