Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Life Histories01:29

Life Histories

18.4K
Overview
18.4K
Types of Selection01:46

Types of Selection

41.0K
Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...
41.0K
Speciation Rates01:07

Speciation Rates

21.3K
Overview
21.3K
Ecological Niches02:02

Ecological Niches

24.1K
All organisms have a position within an ecosystem. The complete set of living and nonliving factors—including food resources, climate, and terrain—that define the position of a given organism are collectively referred to as the organism’s ecological niche.
24.1K
Energy Budgets00:51

Energy Budgets

9.6K
Organisms must balance energy intake with the energy required for growth, maintenance and reproduction. These trade-offs result in a variety of survivorship and reproductive strategies, including semelparity and iteroparity. Semelparous species, like annual plants, have only one reproductive episode in their lifetimes and consequently have short lifespans. Iteroparous species, by contrast, have many reproductive events during their lifetimes but have relatively few offspring. These two...
9.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Scaling and ecomorphology of lagomorph body shape and appendicular skeleton.

Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007)·2026
Same author

The Evolution and Development of Molar Size Among Exudate-Feeding Lorises and Bushbabies.

American journal of biological anthropology·2026
Same author

Convergent mechanisms, divergent strategies: a comparison of nectar intake between a generalist and a specialist bat species.

The Journal of experimental biology·2026
Same author

Long-fuse evolution of carnivoran skeletal phenomes through the Cenozoic.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same author

Extending mammal specimens with their essential phenotypic traits.

Journal of mammalogy·2025
Same author

Functional microanatomy of nasal turbinals in bats.

Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007)·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 12, 2025

Experimental Manipulation of Body Size to Estimate Morphological Scaling Relationships in Drosophila
06:00

Experimental Manipulation of Body Size to Estimate Morphological Scaling Relationships in Drosophila

Published on: October 1, 2011

14.0K

Scaling patterns of body plans differ among squirrel ecotypes.

Tate J Linden1, Abigail E Burtner1, Johannah Rickman1

  • 1University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.

Peerj
|January 31, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Body shape evolution in squirrels is influenced by body size and locomotor ecology. Different squirrel ecotypes show distinct body shape allometry, with rib length and thoracic region contributing most to evolutionary changes.

Keywords:
Axial skeletonBody elongationEcomorphologyEvolutionary allometryThoracolumbar vertebrae

More Related Videos

Non-aversive Animal Restraint Enabling Recording of Optomotor Reflex in Ground Squirrels
07:28

Non-aversive Animal Restraint Enabling Recording of Optomotor Reflex in Ground Squirrels

Published on: July 25, 2025

140
Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems
07:41

Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems

Published on: July 30, 2019

7.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 12, 2025

Experimental Manipulation of Body Size to Estimate Morphological Scaling Relationships in Drosophila
06:00

Experimental Manipulation of Body Size to Estimate Morphological Scaling Relationships in Drosophila

Published on: October 1, 2011

14.0K
Non-aversive Animal Restraint Enabling Recording of Optomotor Reflex in Ground Squirrels
07:28

Non-aversive Animal Restraint Enabling Recording of Optomotor Reflex in Ground Squirrels

Published on: July 25, 2025

140
Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems
07:41

Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems

Published on: July 30, 2019

7.5K

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary Biology
  • Comparative Anatomy
  • Morphometrics

Background:

  • Body size is a key factor influencing morphological diversity across vertebrate skeletons.
  • The relationship between body shape allometry and locomotor specialization remains understudied in many mammalian groups.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how body shape scales with body size (allometry) across different squirrel (Sciuridae) ecotypes.
  • To identify the morphological components driving body shape evolution in relation to locomotor ecology and body size.

Main Methods:

  • Quantified body size and shape of 87 squirrel species using osteological specimens.
  • Applied phylogenetic comparative methods to analyze allometric patterns and morphological contributions to body shape.

Main Results:

  • Body shape and its components exhibit allometry with body size, varying significantly among ecotypes (chipmunks, gliding squirrels, ground squirrels).
  • Ground squirrels showed a relationship between forelimb length and body shape (elongate species have shorter forelimbs).
  • Relative rib length and thoracic region elongation/shortening were primary drivers of body shape evolution.

Conclusions:

  • Body shape evolution in squirrels is significantly shaped by body size and locomotor adaptations.
  • Distinct allometric patterns in body shape exist across squirrel ecotypes, reflecting diverse ecological niches from subterranean to gliding lifestyles.