Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

134
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
134
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

214
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
214
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data01:16

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

180
Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance,...
180
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

4.3K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
4.3K
Confidence Intervals01:21

Confidence Intervals

7.0K
An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a  sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval  contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A...
7.0K
Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean01:25

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean

7.8K
A point estimate of the population mean is obtained from a single sample. Such a point estimate does not represent a population well because it needs to account for variability in the population. Single point estimate can also be biased despite the sample being selected randomly. Thus, a point estimate is often unreliable. A confidence interval is needed to reduce this unreliability.
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
7.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Bayesian Variable Selection for High-Dimensional Mediation Analysis: Application to Metabolomics Data in Epidemiological Studies.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Estimating Causal Treatment Effects in the Sequential Parallel Comparison Design (SPCD).

Statistics in medicine·2025
Same author

Bayesian nonparametric trees for principal causal effects.

Biometrics·2025
Same author

Bayesian Nonparametric Model for Heterogeneous Treatment Effects With Zero-Inflated Data.

Statistics in medicine·2024
Same author

Causal analysis of air pollution mixtures: estimands, positivity, and extrapolation.

American journal of epidemiology·2024
Same author

Multivariate probit linear mixed models for multivariate longitudinal binary data.

Statistics in medicine·2024
Same journal

Fast penalized generalized estimating equations for large longitudinal functional datasets.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Causally-interpretable random-effects meta-analysis.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Statistical inference for mean function of partially observed functional time series.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Subgroup identification via Interaction Tree and Mixed Model for Repeated Measures with application to Alzheimer's disease.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Finite mixtures of linear quantile regressions with concomitant variables: a solution to endogeneity in longitudinal data modeling.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Discussion on "INTACT: a method for integration of longitudinal physical activity data from multiple sources" by Jingru Zhang, Erjia Cui, Hongzhe Li, and Haochang Shou.

Biometrics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 12, 2025

A Novel Bayesian Change-point Algorithm for Genome-wide Analysis of Diverse ChIPseq Data Types
12:39

A Novel Bayesian Change-point Algorithm for Genome-wide Analysis of Diverse ChIPseq Data Types

Published on: December 10, 2012

11.4K

Bayesian nonparametric adjustment of confounding.

Chanmin Kim1, Mauricio Tec2, Corwin Zigler3

  • 1Department of Statistics, SungKyunKwan University, Seoul, South Korea.

Biometrics
|January 31, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a Bayesian nonparametric method for causal inference in observational studies, improving confounder selection and estimation. The approach enhances understanding of environmental exposures, like SO2 emissions, on air pollution.

Keywords:
BARTBayesian nonparametricsair pollutioncausal inferenceconfounder selection

More Related Videos

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.6K
Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 12, 2025

A Novel Bayesian Change-point Algorithm for Genome-wide Analysis of Diverse ChIPseq Data Types
12:39

A Novel Bayesian Change-point Algorithm for Genome-wide Analysis of Diverse ChIPseq Data Types

Published on: December 10, 2012

11.4K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.6K
Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.4K

Area of Science:

  • Causal Inference
  • Bayesian Statistics
  • Environmental Epidemiology

Background:

  • Observational studies face challenges in selecting relevant covariates for causal effect estimation.
  • Ignorable treatment assignment is a key assumption requiring careful confounder adjustment.
  • High-dimensional covariate sets complicate confounder identification and analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a Bayesian nonparametric method for simultaneous confounder selection and causal effect estimation.
  • To account for uncertainty in the nature and role of confounding variables.
  • To improve the accuracy and efficiency of causal inference in complex observational data.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing multiple Bayesian additive regression trees (BART) models.
  • Employing a common prior distribution to assign posterior selection probabilities to covariates.
  • Prioritizing covariates based on their association with both exposure and outcome.

Main Results:

  • Simulations show the proposed method outperforms existing approaches in various scenarios.
  • The method was applied to assess the causal effect of SO2 emissions from coal-fired power plants on air pollution.
  • Results demonstrated more efficient and consistent causal estimates compared to alternatives.

Conclusions:

  • The Bayesian nonparametric approach effectively addresses confounder selection and estimation challenges.
  • The method provides robust causal estimates, accounting for confounding uncertainty.
  • This approach strengthens evidence for the causal link between SO2 emissions and ambient particulate pollution.