Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2025

Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
Update on cardiogenic shock: from detection to team management
Yevgeniy Khariton1, Ossama Abou Hassan, Jaime A Hernandez-Montfort
1Baylor Scott and White Health - Temple, Texas, USA.
Insights
This review summarizes current strategies for diagnosing and managing cardiogenic shock (CS), differentiating between acute myocardial infarction (AMI)-CS and heart failure (HF)-CS. It emphasizes algorithmic approaches and team-based care for improved patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Critical Care Medicine
Background:
- Contemporary cardiogenic shock (CS) management requires updated profiling and diagnostic strategies.
- Understanding clinical differences between acute myocardial infarction (AMI)-CS and heart failure (HF)-CS is crucial for tailored treatment.
Approach:
- This review synthesizes scientific consensus, clinical trial data, and registry findings on CS management.
- It examines biomarker and hemodynamic monitoring, including invasive and noninvasive methods.
- The review discusses transitions to native heart recovery and heart replacement therapies.
Key Points:
- Pulmonary artery catheterization is vital for both AMI-CS and HF-CS.
- Algorithmic approaches integrating clinical, hemodynamic, and imaging data are advocated.
- Interdisciplinary care pathways and protocol-driven care are essential.
Conclusions:
- Routine application of algorithmic approaches and interdisciplinary care pathways can optimize hemodynamic support and organ perfusion in CS.
- Tailored management strategies, informed by real-world data, are key for improving CS patient trajectories.
- Team-based initiatives are trending for effective CS interventions.
Purpose Of Review:
The following review is intended to provide a summary of contemporary cardiogenic shock (CS) profiling and diagnostic strategies, including biomarker and hemodynamic-based (invasive and noninvasive) monitoring, discuss clinical differences in presentation and trajectory between acute myocardial infarction (AMI)-CS and heart failure (HF)-CS, describe transitions to native heart recovery and heart replacement therapies with a focus on tailored management and emerging real-world data, and emphasize trends in team-based initiatives and interventions for cardiogenic shock including the integration of protocol-driven care.
Recent Findings:
This document provides a broad overview of contemporary scientific consensus statements as well as data derived from randomized controlled clinical trials and observational registry working groups focused on cardiogenic shock management.
Summary:
This review highlights the increasingly important role of pulmonary artery catheterization in AMI-CS and HF-CS cardiogenic shock and advocates for routine application of algorithmic approaches with interdisciplinary care pathways. Cardiogenic shock algorithms facilitate the integration of clinical, hemodynamic, and imaging data to determine the most appropriate patient hemodynamic support platform to achieve adequate organ perfusion and decongestion.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Blood Pressure Imbalances and Circulatory Shock
Blood Pressure: Hypertension and Hypotension
Normal blood pressure is 120/80 mm Hg. Elevated blood pressure is 120-129/under 80 mm Hg. Hypertension, warranting treatment at 130/80 mm Hg, is often asymptomatic and can lead to severe cardiovascular events, aneurysms, peripheral arterial disease, chronic renal disease, or cardiac...
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

