Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2025

Foraging Path-length Protocol for Drosophila melanogaster Larvae
Published on: April 23, 2016
Strategy maps: Generalised giving-up densities for optimal foraging
Emerson Arehart1, Jody R Reimer2, Frederick R Adler2
1Department of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Abstract:
Finding a common currency for benefits and hazards is a major challenge in optimal foraging theory, often requiring complex computational methods. We present a new analytic approach that builds on the Marginal Value Theorem and giving-up densities while incorporating the nonlinear effect of predation risk. We map the space of all possible environments into strategy regions, each corresponding to a discrete optimal strategy. This provides a generalised quantitative measure of the trade-off between foraging rewards and hazards. This extends a classic optimal diet choice rule-of-thumb to incorporate the hazard of waiting for better resources to appear. We compare the dynamics of optimal decision-making for three foraging life-history strategies: One in which fitness accrues instantly, and two with delays before fitness benefit is accrued. Foragers with delayed-benefit strategies are more sensitive to predation risk than resource quality, as they stand to lose more fitness from a predation event than instant-accrual foragers.
Related Concept Videos
Life Histories
Conservation of Declining Populations
Limits to Natural Selection
Conservation of Small Populations
Energy Budgets
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...

