Caudal Block versus Wound Infiltration for Inguinal Procedures in Young Children: A Randomized Clinical Study

Sabine Zundel1, Franziska Conz2, Jörg Fuchs2

  • 1Department of Pediatric Surgery, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Spitalstrasse, Luzern, Switzerland.

Insights

Local wound infiltration (LI) and caudal block (CB) provide effective pain relief for pediatric inguinal procedures. LI offers a shorter setup time and fewer complications, making it a recommended option for outpatient surgery.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Surgery
  • Anesthesiology
  • Pain Management

Background:

  • Inguinal procedures are common in pediatric outpatients.
  • Effective pain management and efficient operating room setup are crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare postoperative pain scores and setup times between caudal block (CB) and local wound infiltration (LI) for pediatric inguinal procedures.

Main Methods:

  • Pediatric outpatients undergoing inguinal procedures were randomized.
  • Patients received either preincision CB or end-of-procedure LI.
  • Postoperative pain and setup time were analyzed.

Main Results:

  • No significant difference in postoperative pain scores was observed between the CB and LI groups.
  • Setup time was significantly longer for the CB group (median 22.5 minutes) compared to the LI group (median 17 minutes).

Conclusions:

  • Both CB and LI provide adequate pain control for pediatric inguinal surgery.
  • LI is recommended due to its shorter setup time and lower complication risk.
  • Further research in larger cohorts is needed to confirm these findings and their impact on patient care and efficiency.
Abstract