How well do semiempirical QM methods describe the structure of proteins?

Semiempirical quantum-mechanical (QM) computational methods are an increasingly popular tool for the study of biomolecular systems. They were, however, developed and tested mostly on small model molecules. In this work, we explore one topic fundamental to these applications: the ability of the methods to describe the structure of proteins. In a set of 19 proteins for which a crystal structure with very high resolution is available, we analyze the properties of the protein geometries optimized using several semiempirical QM methods including PM6-D3H4, PM7, and GFN2-xTB. Some of the methods provide a very good description of the general structural features of the protein, yielding results better than or comparable to the AMBER ff03 force field. However, PM7 and PM6-D3H4 optimizations introduce artificial close contacts in the structure, which is partially remediated by reparameterization.