Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2025

Noninvasive Determination of Vortex Formation Time Using Transesophageal Echocardiography During Cardiac Surgery
Published on: November 28, 2018
Left ventricular hypertrophy as a predictor of cardiovascular outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement
Nobuyasu Ito1, Kan Zen1, Motoyoshi Takahara1
1Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Insights
Severe left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) before transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) predicts worse cardiovascular outcomes. Cardiac sympathetic nerve function, assessed by MIBG scintigraphy, is linked to LVH and prognosis after TAVR.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Nuclear Medicine
- Cardiovascular Imaging
Background:
- Severe aortic stenosis is a significant cause of cardiovascular morbidity.
- Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is a common complication of aortic stenosis.
- The prognostic implications of LVH and cardiac sympathetic nerve (CSN) function in patients undergoing TAVR require further elucidation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between pre-operative severe LVH and cardiovascular prognosis in patients undergoing TAVR.
- To assess the association between CSN function, evaluated using 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scintigraphy, and LVH in this patient cohort.
- To explore the correlation between changes in LVH and CSN function post-TAVR.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective observational study of 349 patients who underwent TAVR.
- Patients were stratified into severe LVH (+) and severe LVH (-) groups based on pre-operative assessment.
- Cardiovascular events, left ventricular mass index (LVMi), and MIBG heart-to-mediastinum (H/M) ratios were analyzed pre- and post-TAVR.
Main Results:
- The severe LVH (+) group had a significantly lower rate of freedom from cardiovascular events (87.1% vs. 96.0%).
- Pre-operative severe LVH was associated with lower MIBG H/M ratios (2.33 vs. 2.67), indicating impaired CSN function.
- Post-TAVR, patients with improved LVH showed increased MIBG H/M ratios, while those without improvement had no significant change.
Conclusions:
- Pre-operative severe LVH is a significant predictor of adverse cardiovascular outcomes following TAVR.
- Impaired cardiac sympathetic nerve function is correlated with LVH in severe aortic stenosis patients.
- These findings suggest that LVH and CSN function play a role in the cardiovascular prognosis after TAVR.
Aims:
This study aimed to clarify the relationship between cardiovascular prognosis and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in patients with severe aortic stenosis who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and to investigate the relationship between cardiac sympathetic nerve (CSN) function and these factors using 123 I-metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy.
Methods And Results:
In this single-centre, retrospective observational study, 349 patients who underwent TAVR at our institution between July 2017 and May 2020 were divided into two groups: those with severe LVH pre-operatively [severe LVH (+) group] and those without LVH pre-operatively [severe LVH (-) group]. The rates of freedom from cardiovascular events (cardiovascular death and heart failure hospitalization) were compared. The relationship between changes in left ventricular mass index (LVMi) and changes in delay heart-mediastinum ratio (H/M) from before TAVR to 6 months after TAVR was also investigated. The event-free rate was significantly lower in the severe LVH (+) group (87.1% vs. 96.0%, log-rank P = 0.021). The severe LVH (+) group exhibited a significantly lower delay H/M value, scored by 123 I-metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy, than the severe LVH (-) group (2.33 [1.92-2.67] vs. 2.67 [2.17-3.68], respectively, P < 0.001). Moreover, the event-free rate of post-operative cardiovascular events was lower among patients with a delay H/M value < 2.50 than that among other patients (87.7% vs. 97.2%, log-rank P = 0.012). LVMi was significantly higher (115 [99-130] vs. 90 [78-111] g/m2 , P < 0.001) and delay H/M value was significantly lower (2.53 [1.98-2.83] vs. 2.71 [2.25-3.19], P = 0.025) in the severe LVH (+) group than in the severe LVH (-) group at 6 months after TAVR. Patients with improved LVH at 6 months after TAVR also had increased delay H/M (from 2.51 [2.01-2.81] to 2.67 [2.26-3.02], P < 0.001), whereas those without improved LVH had no significant change in delay H/M (from 2.64 [2.23-3.06] to 2.53 [1.97-3.00], P = 0.829).
Conclusions:
Severe LVH before TAVR is a prognostic factor for poor post-operative cardiovascular outcomes. LVH associated with aortic stenosis and CSN function are correlated, suggesting their involvement in LVH prognosis.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management

