Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2025

Utility of Dissociated Intrinsic Hand Muscle Atrophy in the Diagnosis of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Published on: March 4, 2014
Compound Muscle Action Potential Amplitude as a Predictor of Functional and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Ulnar
Matthew M Florczynski1, Lingxuan Kong2, Patricia B Burns1
1From the Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School.
Background:
Ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (UNE) is a debilitating upper extremity condition that often leaves patients with residual symptoms even after surgical treatment. The role of electrodiagnostic studies in guiding the treatment of UNE is not well established, and conventional electrodiagnostic parameters may not reflect the severity of disease. Compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitude is a parameter that corresponds with axonal injury and motor symptoms and may more accurately predict the severity of neurologic injury.
Methods:
This prospective multicenter study recruited 78 patients in the Surgery of the Ulnar Nerve project. Patients underwent electrodiagnostic testing and clinical assessment of motor and sensory function, and completed patient-reported outcome questionnaires, including the Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire; the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire; and the Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (CTQ). Correlations were measured among each of the electrodiagnostic parameters and outcomes and predictive models for each outcome were subsequently developed.
Results:
Of all the electrodiagnostic parameters measured, only CMAP amplitude was predictive of scores on the Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire; CTQ function scale, and motor impairment in grip and pinch strength. None of the parameters were predictive of scores on the CTQ symptom scale or sensory impairments as measured with two-point discrimination or Semmes-Weinstein monofilament testing.
Conclusions:
CMAP amplitude, but not other conventional electrodiagnostic parameters, is predictive of functional outcomes in UNE. This electrodiagnostic measurement can alert the clinician to severe cases of UNE and inform surgical decision-making.
Clinical Question/Level Of Evidence:
Risk, III.
More Related Videos
09:14Surface Electromyographic Biofeedback as a Rehabilitation Tool for Patients with Global Brachial Plexus Injury Receiving Bionic Reconstruction
Published on: September 28, 2019
09:10Determining the Functional Status of the Corticospinal Tract Within One Week of Stroke
Published on: February 22, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Spinal Nerves: Plexus I
The Cervical Plexus
The cervical plexus, formed by the anterior rami of the first four...
Muscles that Move the Forearm
Forearm Flexors
The biceps brachii, brachialis, and brachioradialis are forearm flexors. The biceps brachii is made up of two heads. Its long head originates at the supraglenoid tubercle of the scapula, whereas that of the short head is...
Generation of Action Potential in Skeletal Muscles
Like neurons, muscle cells are also regarded as excitable due to their capacity to change in response to stimuli, primarily due to voltage-gated ion channels embedded in their plasma membranes, which get activated by alterations in the...
Bones of the Upper Limb: Ulna