Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2025
Quantification of Levator Ani Hiatus Enlargement by Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Males and Females with Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Published on: April 17, 2019
Inter and Intraobserver Variation in Interpretation of Fecal Loading on Abdominal Radiographs
Narendra Yallanki1,2, Lesley Small-Harary1, Jeffrey Morganstern1
1From the Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Stony.
Objectives:
The current gold standard for the diagnosis of functional constipation is the ROME IV criteria. European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) and North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition (NASPGHAN) guidelines do not support the use of abdominal X-rays in establishing the diagnosis of constipation. Despite these recommendations, abdominal radiography is frequently performed to diagnose constipation. The objective of our study is to evaluate inter and intraobserver variation in interpretation of fecal loading on abdominal radiographs.
Methods:
Electronic records of 100 children seen in the emergency room for gastrointestinal symptoms who had an abdominal radiograph performed were included. Four physicians from each specialty including gastroenterology, radiology, and emergency medicine interpreted the radiographs independently. Initially, subjective interpretations, followed by interpretations for intraobserver variation were obtained. Subsequently, all physicians were trained and asked to score the X-rays objectively using Barr and Blethyn scoring systems. Consistency between inter and intraobserver ratings of radiographic interpretation was evaluated using the Kappa coefficient ( k ) which ranges from 0 (no agreement) to 1.0 (perfect agreement).
Results:
For subjective interpretations, k values showed a fixed margin k of 0.18 indicating poor agreement among 12 observers. Intraobserver k to look for reproducibility showed significant variability ranging from 0.08 (poor) to 0.61 (fair) agreement. Objective scoring results for Blethyn showed a k of 0.14 indicating poor agreement among 12 providers.
Conclusions:
Reliability and reproducibility of X-rays for diagnosis and grading of constipation is questionable given poor to fair agreement for both inter and intraobserver comparisons. Our study supports the current recommendation of ESPGHAN and NASPGHAN to not use abdominal X-rays to diagnose constipation.
Related Concept Videos
01:25Assessment of the Rectum and Anus
Rectal Inspection
Begin by inspecting the perianal and anal areas for color, texture, rashes,...
01:26Imaging Studies III: Gastrointestinal Motility Studies and Virtual Colonoscopy
Radionuclide Testing
Radionuclide testing is a sophisticated medical technique for assessing gastrointestinal motility. It focuses on gastric emptying and colonic transit time. Radioactive markers track the movement of food through the digestive system, providing insights into gastrointestinal disorders.
In gastric emptying studies, a meal's liquid and...
01:25Assessment of the Abdomen I: Inspection and Auscultation
The abdominal examination is a cornerstone of clinical medicine, serving as a critical tool in diagnosing various gastrointestinal (GI) diseases. It involves a systematic approach that includes inspection and auscultation, each with distinct yet complementary roles in assessing the abdomen. This article will delve into these two primary methods healthcare professionals use to examine the abdomen.
Inspection of the Abdomen
The first step in any abdominal examination is inspection....
01:17Ultrasonography
During an ultrasonography procedure, a handheld device called...
01:23Assessment of the Abdomen III: Palpation
01:24X-ray Imaging