Commentary on "Consciousness as a Memory System" by Budson, Richman, and Kensinger (2022)

Consciouness is a phenomenon that has eluded explanation by generations of physicians and scientists. Many discussions, experiments, and theories about consciousness have been published, but none has adequately explained the phenomenon. In the previous issue, Budson and colleagues (2022) present a theory of consciousness based on explicit memory processes, with consciousness developing in the context of memory function. In the authors' view, consciousness accompanying other cortical processes such as language or visual-spatial function developed only later in evolution. The evidence presented for this evolutionary sequence, however, is very limited. Furthermore, no discussion is directed toward the theory that consciousness involves the intersection between external perceptions and internal bodily states. The authors also develop the concept that most of our actions, and even our personality, are conscious only after the fact; immediate decisions are taken by the unconscious mind-the "horse" rather than the "rider." There is empirical evidence that rapid decisions and responses occur before they become conscious. However, Budson and colleagues (2022) extend the concept of unconscious decision-making to virtually all actions; in so doing, not only do they minimize the phenomenon of self-conscious awareness, but their theory has disturbing ethical implications for personal responsibility, criminal law, free will, and personality.