Impact of Rurality on Geriatric Emergency General Surgery Patients in New Hampshire

Geriatric patients requiring emergency general surgery (EGS) have significant risk of morbidity and mortality. Rural patients face decreased access to care. We sought to characterize the EGS needs and impact of rurality for geriatric residents of New Hampshire.

A retrospective cohort study of the New Hampshire Uniform Healthcare Facility Discharge Dataset, including patients 65 years and older with urgent/emergent admission who underwent 1 of 7 EGS procedures, grouped by urban or rural county of residence, discharged between 2012-2015.

New Hampshire has 26 acute care hospitals: 10 (38.5%) are in urban counties and 16 (61.5%) are in rural counties. Thirteen (50.0%) are critical access hospitals (1 urban and 12 rural). Of 2,445 geriatric patient discharges, 40% of patients were from rural counties and were demographically similar to urban patients. Rural patients were more likely to present as a hospital transfer (15.4% vs 2.5%, p < 0.01), receive care at a critical access hospital (24.1% vs 1.0%, p < 0.01), receive care outside their home county (32.5% vs 12.8%, p < 0.01), and be transferred to another hospital after surgery. Rural and urban patients underwent similar procedures, with similar lengths of stay, cost of index hospitalization, and mortality.

Rural geriatric patients in New Hampshire are more likely to receive care outside of their home county or be transferred to another hospital. Costs of care were similar but are likely underestimated for rural patients. There was no difference in unadjusted mortality. Further investigation is merited to determine the reasons for hospital transfer in the geriatric EGS population to evaluate which patients may benefit most from remaining close to home vs transferring to other facilities.