Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Metabolomics-guided machine learning reveals diagnostic and mechanistic biomarkers in CHB with MASLD.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Characterization of tongue coating microbiome from patients with colorectal cancer.

Journal of oral microbiology·2024
Same author

Toward Professionalism of Biobanking in China: A Survey on Working Status, Career Development, Challenges, and Prospects of Biobankers.

Biopreservation and biobanking·2023
Same author

Establishment of a Standard Tongue Coating Collection Method for Microbiome Studies.

Biopreservation and biobanking·2023
Same author

CD19<sup>+</sup>CD24<sup>hi</sup>CD38<sup>hi</sup> B Cell Dysfunction in Primary Biliary Cholangitis.

Mediators of inflammation·2020
Same author

Modulation of drug release by decoration with Pluronic F127 to improve anti-colon cancer activity of electrospun fibrous meshes.

Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications·2019

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 11, 2025

Rapid Colorimetric Assays to Qualitatively Distinguish RNA and DNA in Biomolecular Samples
05:52

Rapid Colorimetric Assays to Qualitatively Distinguish RNA and DNA in Biomolecular Samples

Published on: February 4, 2013

42.2K

A Comparative Study of Three Nucleic Acid Integrity Assay Systems.

Xinyi Lu1, Yulian Wei1, Jing Sun1

  • 1State Key Laboratory of Dampness Syndrome of Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.

Biopreservation and Biobanking
|February 3, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study compared three commercial systems for nucleic acid integrity analysis. While comparability was good, biases and linear correlations between systems require further attention for accurate biomaterial quality control.

Keywords:
DNA Integrity NumberRNA Integrity Numbermethodological comparisonnucleic acidquality evaluation

More Related Videos

Proofreading and DNA Repair Assay Using Single Nucleotide Extension and MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry Analysis
11:08

Proofreading and DNA Repair Assay Using Single Nucleotide Extension and MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry Analysis

Published on: June 19, 2018

9.8K
Visual Detection of Multiple Nucleic Acids in a Capillary Array
08:56

Visual Detection of Multiple Nucleic Acids in a Capillary Array

Published on: November 15, 2017

7.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 11, 2025

Rapid Colorimetric Assays to Qualitatively Distinguish RNA and DNA in Biomolecular Samples
05:52

Rapid Colorimetric Assays to Qualitatively Distinguish RNA and DNA in Biomolecular Samples

Published on: February 4, 2013

42.2K
Proofreading and DNA Repair Assay Using Single Nucleotide Extension and MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry Analysis
11:08

Proofreading and DNA Repair Assay Using Single Nucleotide Extension and MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry Analysis

Published on: June 19, 2018

9.8K
Visual Detection of Multiple Nucleic Acids in a Capillary Array
08:56

Visual Detection of Multiple Nucleic Acids in a Capillary Array

Published on: November 15, 2017

7.3K

Area of Science:

  • Biomolecular analysis
  • Quality control in research and development

Background:

  • Nucleic acid integrity is crucial for downstream experiments and biomaterial quality control.
  • Traditional gel electrophoresis is being replaced by standardized, automated, and high-precision electrophoresis techniques.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the comparability and bias of three commercial nucleic acid integrity assay systems.
  • To assess the agreement between different quality metrics (DQN, DQS, RQN, RQS) and established standards (DIN, RINe).

Main Methods:

  • Methodological comparison of BIOptic Qsep400 (DQN, RQN) and PerkinElmer Labchip GX Touch HT (DQS, RQS) against Agilent 4200 TapeStation (DIN, RINe).
  • Utilized 72 DNA and 67 RNA samples for the comparison.
  • Applied Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guideline (EP09-A3) and regression analyses (Passing-Bablok, Deming).

Main Results:

  • Mean bias estimates for DQN vs. DIN and DQS vs. DIN exceeded acceptance criteria.
  • Regression analyses showed biases within criteria for DQN vs. DIN and DQS vs. DIN, with smaller bias for DQN vs. DIN.
  • Regression analyses for RNA integrity (RQN vs. RINe, RQS vs. RINe) showed biases within criteria, but mean bias for RQS vs. RINe was outside criteria.

Conclusions:

  • Good comparability exists between BIOptic Qsep400 and PerkinElmer Labchip GX Touch HT systems for nucleic acid integrity detection.
  • Systematic biases and linear correlations between different assay systems warrant careful consideration for reliable nucleic acid quality assessment.