Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 29, 2026

19:44
A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS
Published on: June 3, 2009
13.8K
Rhythmic tapping difficulties in adults who stutter: A deficit in beat perception, motor execution, or sensorimotor
Anneke Slis1, Christophe Savariaux1, Pascal Perrier1
1CNRS, Grenoble INP, GIPSA-Lab, University Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Plos One
|February 3, 2023
Summary
People who stutter (PWS) show impaired rhythmic movement production and sensorimotor feedback processing. Their timing variability in rhythmic tasks suggests deficits in neuronal oscillator coupling during production.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Speech and Hearing Science
- Motor Control
Background:
- Stuttering is a complex speech disorder potentially involving motor control deficits.
- Rhythmic abilities and sensorimotor integration are crucial for fluent speech production.
- Understanding rhythmic impairments in people who stutter (PWS) can elucidate underlying mechanisms.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate rhythmic abilities in adults who stutter (PWS).
- To identify potential impairments in beat perception/reproduction, movement execution, and sensorimotor integration in PWS.
- To compare rhythmic task performance between PWS and typically developing controls (PNS).
Main Methods:
- 16 adults who stutter (PWS) and 16 matched controls (PNS) performed five rhythmic tasks.
- Tasks included synchronization (isochronous and non-isochronous patterns), reaction to unpredictable patterns, and reproduction of learned patterns.
- Finger tapping behavior was analyzed for accuracy, variability, and asynchrony.
Main Results:
- PWS exhibited increased tapping variability and larger negative mean asynchronies compared to PNS during synchronization tasks.
- While PWS could reproduce rhythmic patterns accurately, their variability was higher, indicating production rather than perception deficits.
- Sensorimotor learning and task complexity did not significantly alter group differences in rhythmic performance.
Conclusions:
- Findings support a deficit in neuronal oscillator coupling for rhythmic pattern production in PWS, not perception.
- PWS demonstrate delayed multi-modal feedback processing.
- These motor control and processing differences may contribute to stuttering.

