Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Generalized Anxiety Disorder01:30

Generalized Anxiety Disorder

177
Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) is a chronic condition characterized by excessive and uncontrollable worry that persists for at least six months, significantly interfering with daily functioning. Unlike situational anxiety, which arises in response to specific stressors, GAD often occurs without a clear cause. Individuals may experience disproportionate worry about work, health, or relationships. For instance, a person might continuously fear poor health despite normal medical evaluations or...
177
The Availability Heuristic01:08

The Availability Heuristic

6.1K
A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):
6.1K
Generalization, Discrimination, and Extinction01:24

Generalization, Discrimination, and Extinction

709
Generalization, discrimination, and extinction are key concepts in operant conditioning that influence how behaviors are learned and maintained.
Generalization occurs when a behavior reinforced in one context is performed in similar situations. For instance, a student who studies diligently for calculus and receives excellent grades might apply the same study habits to psychology and history, expecting similar results. Generalization shows how learning in one setting can influence behavior in...
709
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

12.9K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
12.9K
Framing Effects03:26

Framing Effects

7.4K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.4K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

155
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
155

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The criticality of risk generalization beliefs. An experimental study on communication about risk of bamboo tableware.

Environmental research·2024
Same author

Eliminating the effects of reporting bias on risk perception.

The Science of the total environment·2023
Same author

Effects of selective outcome reporting on risk perception.

Environmental research·2021
Same author

Framing effects in risk communication messages - Hazard identification vs. risk assessment.

Environmental research·2020
Same author

ERP components associated with an indirect emotional stop signal task in healthy and depressed participants.

International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology·2017
Same author

Effects of aging and depression on mnemonic discrimination ability.

Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition·2017

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 11, 2025

Investigating Pain-Related Avoidance Behavior using a Robotic Arm-Reaching Paradigm
09:00

Investigating Pain-Related Avoidance Behavior using a Robotic Arm-Reaching Paradigm

Published on: October 3, 2020

4.0K

Effects of generalization descriptions on risk perception.

F Freudenstein1, F Boerner2, R J Croft3

  • 1Australian Centre for Electromagnetic Bioeffects Research, Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia; Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Centre for Population Health Research on Electromagnetic Energy, Monash University, VIC, Australia; Faculty of Social Work, Health and Nursing, Ravensburg-Weingarten University of Applied Sciences, Weingarten, Germany.

Environmental Research
|February 4, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Generalization descriptions did not alter risk perceptions of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF EMF). However, individuals with strong risk generalization beliefs showed higher perceived risks for various EMF sources, regardless of the intervention.

Keywords:
Base stationsElectromagnetic fieldsGeneralization effectsMobile phonesRisk communicationRisk perception

More Related Videos

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat
11:18

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat

Published on: September 12, 2014

15.3K
Measuring Attentional Biases for Threat in Children and Adults
08:25

Measuring Attentional Biases for Threat in Children and Adults

Published on: October 19, 2014

15.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 11, 2025

Investigating Pain-Related Avoidance Behavior using a Robotic Arm-Reaching Paradigm
09:00

Investigating Pain-Related Avoidance Behavior using a Robotic Arm-Reaching Paradigm

Published on: October 3, 2020

4.0K
Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat
11:18

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat

Published on: September 12, 2014

15.3K
Measuring Attentional Biases for Threat in Children and Adults
08:25

Measuring Attentional Biases for Threat in Children and Adults

Published on: October 19, 2014

15.4K

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Health
  • Risk Communication
  • Psychology of Risk Perception

Background:

  • Public perception of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF EMF) is influenced by media reports and scientific classifications.
  • The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified RF EMF as possibly carcinogenic, leading to public concern.
  • Understanding how generalization of risk information affects perception is crucial for effective risk communication.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of different generalization descriptions on public risk perception of RF EMF.
  • To assess whether risk generalization beliefs mediate the relationship between information exposure and risk perception.
  • To examine risk perceptions across various RF EMF sources, including mobile phones, base stations, and power lines.

Main Methods:

  • A 1-factorial online experiment with 629 participants randomly assigned to three groups.
  • Participants received different text modules about RF EMF and cancer risk from mobile phones.
  • Risk perceptions were measured before and after text exposure, alongside an assessment of risk generalization beliefs.

Main Results:

  • No significant differences in risk perception were found between the three experimental groups.
  • All groups showed increased risk perception for all tested electromagnetic field (EMF) sources after reading the texts.
  • Individuals with strong risk generalization beliefs reported significantly higher risk perceptions for most EMF sources compared to those with weak beliefs.

Conclusions:

  • The specific wording of generalization descriptions did not significantly alter immediate risk perceptions of RF EMF.
  • Pre-existing risk generalization beliefs strongly predict perceived risks across various EMF exposures.
  • Future risk communication strategies should consider individual differences in risk generalization to tailor messaging effectively.