Patient experience and satisfaction with different temporomandibular joint treatments: A retrospective study

This retrospective study aimed to evaluate patient satisfaction with different temporomandibular joint (TMJ) treatments. Patients were included in the study according to the following inclusion criteria: 1) arthrogenous and/or myogenous temporomandibular disorders (TMD); 2) Dimitroulis classification category between 1-4; 3) conservative treatment without any improvement at least for 3 months; 4) indication for one of the following TMD treatments: injection of botulinum toxin; arthrocentesis; arthroscopy, and open surgery without alloplastic material; and 5) age ≥16 years. An independent satisfaction questionnaire with 11 queries was applied via phone call to all patients, which included 6 questions using a 10-point Likert scale and 5 yes-or-no questions. The principal outcome was the overall satisfaction with the clinical result of the treatment, and the secondary outcomes were specific satisfaction with the following: 1) pain reduction; 2) range of mouth opening; 3) chewing ability; 4) postoperative recovery; 5) the fulfillment of expectations; 6) treatment choice; 7) treatment recommendation to a friend; and 8) the need for another intervention. Anxiety and depression were also included as variables. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis and Spearman rank correlation coefficient tests. A total of 120 patients (mean age 41.20 ± 17.78 years) were enrolled, comprising 109 women (90%) and 11 men (10%). The overall clinical satisfaction of all patients was 8.24 ± 2.23 (mean ± SD), and 97 patients (80.8%) stated that they would repeat the treatment. Patients submitted to TMJ arthrocentesis and arthroscopy had higher overall clinical satisfaction (9.09 ± 0.971 and 9.03 ± 1.13, p = 0.021) followed by open surgery (8.38 ± 1.84). The authors observed three statistically significant correlations: 1) overall clinical satisfaction and patient expectations (r = 0.803; p < 0.0001); 2) overall clinical satisfaction and post-treatment pain (r = -0.299; p = 0.003); and (3) the presence of depression and the need for further TMJ treatment (r = 0.186; p = 0.043). Within the limitations of the study it seems that patient expectations should be addressed ad initium, and the presence of a diagnosis of depression with concomitant TMD must alert the clinical team and patient for the possible need of additional treatment.