Copredication and Complexity Revisited: Reply to Murphy's Reply
Christian Michel1, Guido Löhr2
1School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh.
Löhr and Michel (2022) proposed a neurocognitive model for sentence acceptability, addressing predicate order effects. This reply clarifies disagreements and refutes misrepresentations of their predictive processing model.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Science
- Linguistics
- Neuroscience
Background:
- The predictive processing paradigm offers a framework for understanding cognitive functions.
- Copredication sentences present unique challenges for models of sentence acceptability.
- Predicate order effects in copredication sentences require explanation.
More Related Videos
11:09RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans
Published on: July 17, 2021
08:32Examining Online Syntactic Processing of Spoken Complex Sentences in Chinese Using Dual-Modal Interference Tasks
Published on: September 5, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error
Woodward–Hoffmann Selection Rules and Microscopic Reversibility
Factors Affecting Dissolution: Polymorphism, Amorphism and Pseudopolymorphism
Some polymorphic crystals possess lower aqueous solubility than their amorphous counterparts, leading to incomplete absorption. For instance, the oral suspension of Chloramphenicol, which...
Principle of Equivalence
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error
Methods of Documentation II: POMR
