Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Methods old and new for analyzing occupational cohort data.

A S Whittemore1

  • 1Department of Family, Community and Preventive Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, California 94305.

American Journal of Industrial Medicine
|January 1, 1987
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Increased cancer risks for relatives of very early-onset breast cancer cases with and without BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations.

British journal of cancer·2010
Same author

Tagging single-nucleotide polymorphisms in candidate oncogenes and susceptibility to ovarian cancer.

British journal of cancer·2009
Same author

Validating genetic risk associations for ovarian cancer through the international Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium.

British journal of cancer·2009
Same author

Progesterone receptor variation and risk of ovarian cancer is limited to the invasive endometrioid subtype: results from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium pooled analysis.

British journal of cancer·2008
Same author

Population-based estimates of breast cancer risks associated with ATM gene variants c.7271T>G and c.1066-6T>G (IVS10-6T>G) from the Breast Cancer Family Registry.

Human mutation·2006
Same author

Oral contraceptive use and ovarian cancer risk among carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations.

British journal of cancer·2004
Same journal

Health Impacts of the World Trade Center Disaster-A Call to Study Those Exposed at a Young Age.

American journal of industrial medicine·2026
Same journal

Postsurgical Opioid Prescribing Among Injured Workers in Washington State: 2017-2020 Trends and Policy Effects.

American journal of industrial medicine·2026
Same journal

Life in the Driver's Seat: A Qualitative Analysis of Rideshare Drivers' Perspectives of Their Work and Well-Being Using Reddit Posts.

American journal of industrial medicine·2026
Same journal

Response to Healthcare Workers' Workplace Violence in Colombia.

American journal of industrial medicine·2026
Same journal

Exposure to Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons, but Not to Dust or Fluorides, in the Norwegian Aluminum Industry Is Associated With Accelerated Annual Decline in Lung Function.

American journal of industrial medicine·2026
Same journal

Beyond Water, Rest, and Shade: Advancing Farmworker Heat Protection Through Partnership.

American journal of industrial medicine·2026
See all related articles

The person-years approach for occupational cohort mortality analysis is enhanced by modern maximum likelihood methods. This statistical advancement addresses limitations of the standardized mortality ratio, improving exposure-disease association estimates.

Area of Science:

  • Occupational Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics
  • Public Health

Background:

  • The person-years approach has been a standard for analyzing occupational cohort mortality since the mid-20th century.
  • This method involves cross-classifying deaths and observation times to calculate expected deaths and the standardized mortality ratio (SMR).
  • Traditional SMR analysis has known limitations and relies on specific assumptions that may not always hold true for occupational data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To demonstrate how recent advancements in maximum likelihood methods can enhance the person-years approach for occupational cohort data.
  • To address and resolve issues associated with the standardized mortality ratio by applying more appropriate statistical inference techniques.
  • To provide methods for testing assumptions underlying mortality analyses in occupational cohort studies, using lung cancer as an example.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

  • Application of maximum likelihood statistical inference to occupational cohort mortality data.
  • Comparison of maximum likelihood estimates with traditional standardized mortality ratio (SMR) calculations.
  • Development and description of methods for testing statistical assumptions relevant to occupational cohort studies.

Main Results:

  • Maximum likelihood methods provide improved estimates of measures of association between occupational exposures and disease.
  • Problems previously cited with the standardized mortality ratio are shown to stem from inappropriate statistical assumptions.
  • The paper illustrates how modern statistical tools overcome SMR limitations, using occupational lung cancer studies as examples.

Conclusions:

  • Recent developments in maximum likelihood statistical inference justify and extend the traditional person-years approach.
  • Maximum likelihood methods offer a more robust framework for analyzing occupational cohort mortality data, addressing limitations of the SMR.
  • The study provides practical guidance and methods for assumption testing in occupational epidemiology.