Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 11, 2025

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Coronary Artery Revascularization
Published on: September 15, 2023
Can Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Revive a Failing Heart?
Saad M Ezad1, Matthew Ryan1, Divaka Perera1
1British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence and NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at the School of Cardiovascular Medicine and Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Insights
Percutaneous coronary intervention did not significantly improve outcomes for patients with coronary artery disease and heart failure. Optimal medical therapy remains the primary management strategy for this patient group.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Heart Failure Research
Background:
- Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.
- Management strategies for CAD patients with ischaemic left ventricular systolic dysfunction require further evidence, particularly regarding revascularization.
- Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and surgical revascularization are potential treatment options.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) plus optimal medical therapy (OMT) versus OMT alone in patients with CAD and ischaemic left ventricular systolic dysfunction.
- To compare the findings of the REVIVED-BCIS2 trial with those of the STICH trial (Surgical Treatment for Ischaemic Heart Failure).
- To propose a clinical management pathway for patients with ischaemic left ventricular dysfunction.
Main Methods:
- The REVIVED-BCIS2 trial was a randomized controlled trial assessing PCI in addition to OMT.
- Patients included had stable CAD and ischaemic left ventricular systolic dysfunction.
- Comparison was made with historical data from the STICH trial investigating surgical revascularization.
Main Results:
- Percutaneous coronary intervention in addition to optimal medical therapy did not result in a statistically significant improvement in the primary composite endpoint compared to optimal medical therapy alone.
- The study provides crucial data on the role of PCI in this specific patient population.
- Comparison with the STICH trial offers insights into different revascularization strategies.
Conclusions:
- Percutaneous coronary intervention does not appear to offer significant benefits over optimal medical therapy for patients with coronary artery disease and reduced ejection fraction.
- Further research is needed to refine treatment strategies for ischaemic left ventricular systolic dysfunction.
- Clinical decision-making should be guided by current evidence, considering both PCI and surgical revascularization options.
Abstract:
Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains the most common cause of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; despite its prevalence, there is limited evidence to guide physicians in managing patients with CAD with percutaneous revascularization. The REVIVED-BCIS2 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01920048) represents the first randomized trial to assess the value of percutaneous coronary intervention in addition to optimal medical therapy in patients with ischaemic left ventricular systolic dysfunction and stable CAD. In this article, we review the results of the REVIVED-BCIS2 trial and compare them to the ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00023595 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00023595), which investigated the benefit of surgical revascularization on such patients. Finally, we suggest a pathway for physicians managing patients with ischaemic left ventricular systolic dysfunction based on the current evidence and highlight potential avenues for future research.
More Related Videos
12:45Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
06:10Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use