Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 11, 2025

Identifying Coronary Artery Calcification on Non-gated Computed Tomography Scans
Published on: August 28, 2018
Intra-individual comparison of coronary calcium scoring between photon counting detector- and energy integrating
Elias V Wolf1,2, Moritz C Halfmann1,3, U Joseph Schoepf2
1Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany.
Purpose:
To compare coronary artery calcium volume and score (CACS) between photon-counting detector (PCD) and conventional energy integrating detector (EID) computed tomography (CT) in a phantom and prospective patient study.
Methods:
A commercially available CACS phantom was scanned with a standard CACS protocol (120 kVp, slice thickness/increment 3/1.5 mm, and a quantitative Qr36 kernel), with filtered back projection on the EID-CT, and with monoenergetic reconstruction at 70 keV and quantum iterative reconstruction off on the PCD-CT. The same settings were used to prospectively acquire data in patients (n = 23, 65 ± 12.1 years), who underwent PCD- and EID-CT scans with a median of 5.5 (3.0-12.5) days between the two scans in the period from August 2021 to March 2022. CACS was quantified using a commercially available software solution. A regression formula was obtained from the aforementioned comparison and applied to simulate risk reclassification in a pre-existing cohort of 514 patients who underwent a cardiac EID-CT between January and December 2021.
Results:
Based on the phantom experiment, CACS showed a more accurate measurement of the reference CAC volumes (overestimation of physical volumes: PCD-CT 66.1 ± 1.6% vs. EID-CT: 77.2 ± 0.5%). CACS and CACS were strongly correlated, however, the latter measured significantly lower values in the phantom (CACS : 60.5 (30.2-170.3) vs CACS 74.7 (34.6-180.8), p = 0.0015, r = 0.99, mean bias -9.7, Limits of Agreement (LoA) -36.6/17.3) and in patients (non-significant) (CACS : 174.3 (11.1-872.7) vs CACS 218.2 (18.5-876.4), p = 0.10, r = 0.94, mean bias -41.1, LoA -315.3/232.5). The systematic lower measurements of Agatston score on PCD-CT system led to reclassification of 5.25% of our simulated patient cohort to a lower classification class.
Conclusion:
CACS is feasible and correlates strongly with CACS , however, leads to lower CACS values. PCD-CT may provide results that are more accurate for CACS than EID-CT.
More Related Videos
06:57Author Spotlight: Advancing Cardiovascular Imaging - Introducing the Spatially Weighted Calcium Score for Early Disease Detection
Published on: September 22, 2023
08:02Author Spotlight: Enhanced Quantification of Cardiovascular Calcification Progression for Longitudinal Micro PET/CT Studies in Small Research Animals
Published on: November 15, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System III: X-Ray
Definition and Purpose
An X-ray, or radiograph, is a non-invasive method that uses ionizing radiation to take images of internal structures. It is mainly used in cardiac imaging to examine the heart, lungs, and major blood vessels, aiming to identify abnormalities in the heart's size, shape, and position, such as heart failure, congenital defects, and vascular...
Computed Tomography
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Radiological Investigation III: Pulmonary Angiogram and PET Scan
Pulmonary Angiogram
A Pulmonary Angiogram is an invasive procedure involving injecting a contrast medium through a catheter threaded into the pulmonary artery or the right side of the heart to visualize the pulmonary vasculature. Computed Tomography (CT) scans have mainly replaced this...