Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

11.7K
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
11.7K
Aggregates Classification01:29

Aggregates Classification

359
Aggregate classification is generally based on its size, petrographic characteristics, weight, and source. Size classification ranges from coarse to fine aggregates, defined by the size of the particles. Coarse aggregates are particles that do not pass through ASTM sieve No. 4, and aggregates that pass through the sieve are fine aggregates.
Petrographic classification groups aggregates based on common mineralogical characteristics. Some of the common mineral groups found in aggregates are...
359
Extraction: Advanced Methods00:56

Extraction: Advanced Methods

505
Metal ions can be separated from one another by complexation with organic ligands–the chelating agent– to form uncharged chelates. Here, the chelating agent must contain hydrophobic groups and behave as a weak acid, losing a proton to bind with the metal. Since most organic ligands used in this process are insoluble or undergo oxidation in the aqueous phase, the chelating agent is initially added to the organic phase and extracted into the aqueous phase. The metal-ligand complex is...
505
Data Validation01:15

Data Validation

202
Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
202

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Black Hole Spectroscopy and Tests of General Relativity with GW250114.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

Particle background characterization and prediction for the NUCLEUS reactor CE <math><mi>ν</mi></math> NS experiment.

The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2026
Same author

GW250114: Testing Hawking's Area Law and the Kerr Nature of Black Holes.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Optimal Operation of Cryogenic Calorimeters Through Deep Reinforcement Learning.

Computing and software for big science·2024
Same author

The Apical Sodium-Dependent Bile Acid Transporter in Cholangiocytes Is Not Required for the Generation of Bile Flow in Mice.

Gastro hep advances·2024
Same author

Prospective phase II trial on ablative stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for medically inoperable thoracic nodes metastases.

Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 11, 2025

DNA Virus Detection System Based on RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-SPM and Deep Learning
04:17

DNA Virus Detection System Based on RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-SPM and Deep Learning

Published on: May 10, 2024

840

Towards an automated data cleaning with deep learning in CRESST.

G Angloher1, S Banik2,3, D Bartolot2

  • 1Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, D-80805 München, Germany.

European Physical Journal Plus
|February 6, 2023
PubMed
Summary

The CRESST experiment uses neural networks to clean dark matter data, improving accuracy by identifying signal artefacts. This automated approach enhances the reliability of nuclear recoil measurements for dark matter searches.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: AI-Driven Trypanosome Species Detection from Microscopic Images
08:20

Author Spotlight: AI-Driven Trypanosome Species Detection from Microscopic Images

Published on: October 27, 2023

1.6K
Deep Neural Networks for Image-Based Dietary Assessment
13:19

Deep Neural Networks for Image-Based Dietary Assessment

Published on: March 13, 2021

9.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 11, 2025

DNA Virus Detection System Based on RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-SPM and Deep Learning
04:17

DNA Virus Detection System Based on RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-SPM and Deep Learning

Published on: May 10, 2024

840
Author Spotlight: AI-Driven Trypanosome Species Detection from Microscopic Images
08:20

Author Spotlight: AI-Driven Trypanosome Species Detection from Microscopic Images

Published on: October 27, 2023

1.6K
Deep Neural Networks for Image-Based Dietary Assessment
13:19

Deep Neural Networks for Image-Based Dietary Assessment

Published on: March 13, 2021

9.3K

Area of Science:

  • * Particle Physics
  • * Astrophysics
  • * Data Science

Background:

  • * The CRESST (Cryogenic Rare Event Search and Superconducting Spectrometer) experiment uses cryogenic calorimeters to detect nuclear recoils from potential dark matter particles.
  • * Accurate reconstruction of recoil energies is crucial, but susceptible to pile-up and detector artefacts.
  • * Current data cleaning methods are manual and time-consuming, necessitating automated solutions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • * To automate the data cleaning process for CRESST experiment's nuclear recoil signals using neural networks.
  • * To evaluate the effectiveness of different neural network architectures for this time series classification task.
  • * To assess the performance of the trained models in terms of accuracy, recall, and selectivity.

Main Methods:

  • * A dataset of over one million labeled signal records from 68 CRESST detectors (2013-2019) was used.
  • * Four common neural network architectures were trained and tested for time series classification.
  • * Performance was evaluated using balanced accuracy on real data and recall/selectivity on simulated data.

Main Results:

  • * The best performing neural network model achieved a balanced accuracy of 0.932.
  • * Analysis revealed that approximately 50% of misclassified events were due to incorrect initial labeling.
  • * Further investigation showed a significant portion of remaining misclassifications had context-dependent ground truths.

Conclusions:

  • * Neural networks provide a highly effective automated solution for cleaning CRESST data, significantly improving signal processing.
  • * The developed models demonstrate strong performance, confirming their suitability for real-time data cleaning in dark matter detection.
  • * Findings highlight the potential for machine learning to refine the analysis of complex experimental data in particle physics.