Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 11, 2025

Endoscopic Cholesteatoma Surgery
Published on: January 19, 2022
A Comparative Study of Using Collagen Patch or Fat Plug in Myringoplasty for Small Tympanic Membrane Perforations
M Ajaiy1, G Sankaranarayanan2, Aishwarya Jayaprakash3
1Department of ENT, Karpaga Vinayaga Institute of Medical Sciences, Maduranthakam, India.
This study compared collagen patches and fat plugs for treating small tympanic membrane perforations. Both methods showed equal success rates and significant hearing improvement in patients.
Area of Science:
- Otorhinolaryngology
- Biomaterials in Medicine
Background:
- Tympanic membrane perforation is a common otorhinolaryngology issue.
- While small perforations often heal spontaneously, some persist due to factors like infection.
- Various grafting materials have been used with success for persistent perforations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of a novel collagen patch versus a conventional fat plug for treating small tympanic membrane perforations.
- To evaluate healing rates, closure success, and hearing improvement as office-based procedures.
Main Methods:
- A prospective study involving 60 patients with small tympanic membrane perforations.
- Patients were divided into two groups: one treated with a collagen patch, the other with a fat plug.
- Success rates, healing, closure, and audiometric (air-bone gap) improvements were assessed at 1 and 2 months post-procedure.
Main Results:
- Both the collagen patch and fat plug groups demonstrated statistically equal success rates for healing and complete closure at 1 and 2 months.
- Significant hearing improvement (air-bone gap reduction) was observed in both treatment groups compared to pre-operative levels.
- Perforation location did not correlate with hearing outcomes, though anterior quadrant perforations showed slightly better healing rates.
- Infective causes were associated with higher failure rates in both groups.
Conclusions:
- Collagen patches and fat plugs are equally effective office procedures for treating small tympanic membrane perforations.
- Both methods lead to significant improvements in hearing following the procedure.
- Perforation etiology (especially infection) and location may influence treatment outcomes.
More Related Videos
09:18A Comparative Study of Drug Delivery Methods Targeted to the Mouse Inner Ear: Bullostomy Versus Transtympanic Injection
Published on: March 8, 2017
09:07Author Spotlight: Advancing Endoscopic Ossiculoplasty – Techniques, Innovations, and Practical Guidance for Clinical Integration
Published on: January 26, 2024