Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 11, 2025

Electrically Evoked Stapedius Reflex Measurements in Cochlear Implantation and Its Application in the Postoperative Fitting Process
Published on: June 21, 2024
Effect of Efferent Stimulation on the Differential Sensitivity in Individuals with Normal Hearing
Adithya Sreedhar1, Praveen Prakash1, Abishek Umashankar1
1Department of Audiology, All India Institute of Speech and Hearing Mysuru, Naimisham Campus, Road No. 3 TK Layout, Manasagangotri, Mysuru, Karnataka 570006 India.
Abstract:
The aim of the article was to compare the conditions of silent and contralateral noise on Differential sensitivity in normal hearing individuals. A total of 40 participants (20 males and 20 females) were enrolled in the study with a mean age of 21.7 years, participants with normal hearing thresholds and no history of middle ear pathology were enrolled for the study. Difference limen tests such as difference limen for intensity (DLI), difference limen for frequency (DLF), and difference limen for time (DLT) were carried out in these 40 individuals in the two conditions of silent and contralateral noise using MATLAB. Statistical analysis was carried out using the SPSS version 25.0 were descriptive and inferential statistics were carried out. Data was normally distributed on the Shapiro-Wilk's test of normality due to which a paired t test was carried out to establish the nature of significance between the silent and contralateral noise condition. Results reveal the presence of significant difference (P < 0.01) between the groups for DLF and DLT with contralateral noise condition performing better than silent condition for the parameters. However, no significant difference was obtained for DLI. There is a positive effect of the efferent auditory pathway on the Differential sensitivity thus implying that speech perception in noise is improved in the presence of background noise for normal hearing individuals due to this effect. But in case of DLI, the reduced spread of excitation could be the reason why there were no significant differences between silent and contralateral noise condition.
More Related Videos
11:39Assessment of Audio-Tactile Sensory Substitution Training in Participants with Profound Deafness Using the Event-Related Potential Technique
Published on: September 7, 2022
10:50Behavioral Determination of Stimulus Pair Discrimination of Auditory Acoustic and Electrical Stimuli Using a Classical Conditioning and Heart-rate Approach
Published on: June 6, 2012