Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 11, 2025

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Quantification of Pulmonary Perfusion using Calibrated Arterial Spin Labeling
Published on: May 30, 2011
AI-AIF: artificial intelligence-based arterial input function for quantitative stress perfusion cardiac magnetic
Cian M Scannell1,2, Ebraham Alskaf1, Noor Sharrack3
1School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, 4th Floor Lambeth Wing, St Thomas' Hospital, London SE1 7EH, UK.
A deep learning model accurately predicts myocardial blood flow (MBF) from stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. This AI-based approach corrects for signal saturation, enabling precise MBF quantification with a single imaging sequence and contrast injection.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Imaging
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Quantifying myocardial blood flow (MBF) using stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is hindered by signal saturation effects in the arterial input function (AIF).
- The non-linear relationship between gadolinium concentration and MR signal complicates accurate AIF estimation, impacting MBF quantification.
- Accurate AIF is critical for reliable MBF measurements in CMR, especially in clinical settings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate a deep learning model for predicting an unsaturated arterial input function (AIF) from standard cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) images.
- To enable accurate quantification of myocardial blood flow (MBF) using a single-sequence acquisition and a single contrast injection.
- To overcome signal saturation challenges in AIF estimation for stress perfusion CMR.
Main Methods:
- A 1D U-Net deep learning model was trained to predict unsaturated AIF from saturated AIF derived from standard CMR images.
- Training data utilized reference dual-sequence acquisition AIFs (DS-AIFs) from 201 patients.
- The model was tested on independent cohorts from two centers (n=44), comparing AI-AIF derived MBF with DS-AIF quantified MBF.
Main Results:
- The AI-AIF method showed no statistically significant difference in MBF quantification compared to the DS-AIF method (2.77 vs. 2.79 mL/min/g, P=0.33).
- Bland-Altman analysis revealed minimal bias (-0.11 mL/min/g) between AI-AIF and DS-AIF for quantitative MBF.
- MBF diagnosis classification using AI-AIF agreed with DS-AIF in 95% of myocardial segments.
Conclusions:
- Stress perfusion CMR for MBF quantification is feasible using a single-sequence acquisition and single contrast injection.
- An AI-based correction of the arterial input function (AIF) effectively addresses signal saturation issues.
- This deep learning approach facilitates accurate and efficient MBF assessment in clinical practice.
More Related Videos
05:23Author Spotlight: Noninvasive Cerebral Blood Flow Determination in Human Functional Brain Region for Diagnosis of Neurological Disorders
Published on: May 31, 2024
11:13Quantification of Mouse Heart Left Ventricular Function, Myocardial Strain, and Hemodynamic Forces by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: May 24, 2021