Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 11, 2025
Quantitation of Intra-peritoneal Ovarian Cancer Metastasis
Published on: July 18, 2016
Visual Peritoneal Evaluation of Residual Disease After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Advanced Ovarian Cancer Patients:
Barbara Costantini1, Andrea Rosati1, Virginia Vargiu2
1Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Background:
Chemotherapy induces histopathological tumor necrosis and fibrosis which results in macroscopic tissue changes, making surgeons' intraoperative visual evaluation of the disease distribution more difficult to interpret. The aim of the study was to assess the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of intraoperative laparoscopic visual evaluation of the diaphragmatic peritoneum and compare it with histopathological examination.
Methods:
Patients receiving diaphragmatic peritonectomy at time of IDS were retrospectively included. The population was grouped based on the surgeon's assessment of the diaphragmatic peritoneum during diagnostic laparoscopy. Group 1 included patients with a "visually pathologic" diaphragmatic peritoneum, and group 2 included patients with a "visually dubious" diaphragmatic peritoneum. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and accuracy were calculated considering the final formalin-fixed pathology as the reference standard.
Results:
155 patients were included (92 in group 1 and 63 in group 2). The accuracy rate of visual examination was 67.1%, the negative predictive value was 19%, specificity was 100%, and sensitivity was 64.3%.
Conclusion:
NACT strongly affects the ability of the surgeon to discern between peritoneal scars and truly pathologic peritoneum. The diaphragmatic laparoscopic visual examination showed a low overall accuracy. We propose an algorithm that can guide the surgeon towards a more tailored approach to diaphragmatic peritonectomy during IDS.
