Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Relationship Formation02:12

Relationship Formation

40.2K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
40.2K
Social Exchange Theory02:06

Social Exchange Theory

34.6K
We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
34.6K
Robbers Cave04:49

Robbers Cave

14.3K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.3K
Concepts and Prototypes01:24

Concepts and Prototypes

198
The human nervous system handles vast amounts of information by translating sensory stimuli into neural impulses, which the brain processes, creating thoughts expressed through language or stored as memories. The brain also synthesizes information from emotions and memories, which significantly influence thoughts and behaviors. This intricate process creates a comprehensive mental picture.
The brain organizes this information using concepts, which are mental categories grouping linguistic data,...
198
Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?01:17

Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?

28.2K
The outcome of any hypothesis testing leads to rejecting or not rejecting the null hypothesis. This decision is taken based on the analysis of the data, an appropriate test statistic, an appropriate confidence level, the critical values, and P-values. However, when the evidence suggests that the null hypothesis cannot be rejected, is it right to say, 'Accept' the null hypothesis?
There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null...
28.2K
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

12.9K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
12.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Tracking patterns in toxicity and antisocial behavior over user lifetimes on large social media platforms.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

A comprehensive generalization of the Friendship Paradox to weights and attributes.

Scientific reports·2024
Same author

The Inversion Problem: Why Algorithms Should Infer Mental State and Not Just Predict Behavior.

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2023
Same author

Human bias in algorithm design.

Nature human behaviour·2023
Same author

Cohort bias in predictive risk assessments of future criminal justice system involvement.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2023
Same author

Author Correction: Node-based generalized friendship paradox fails.

Scientific reports·2023
Same journal

Integrated multi-assessment and structural performance index framework for stacking-sequence optimisation of natural fibre reinforced laminates.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

SuperiorGAT: graph attention networks for sparse LiDAR point cloud reconstruction in autonomous systems.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

The effect of stretching the pectoralis major, sternocleidomastoid, and iliopsoas muscles on 800 m swimming performance in master swimmers.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

ISNR-PQC: isometry noise resilience post quantum cryptography primitive.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

Identification of high-yielding and stable genotypes of barley in the cold climate of Iran using AMMI and GGE biplot models.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

Bayesian negative binomial modelling of spatial and temporal patterns of road traffic deaths in Ghana.

Scientific reports·2026
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 11, 2025

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.4K

Node-based generalized friendship paradox fails.

Anna Evtushenko1, Jon Kleinberg2,3

  • 1Department of Information Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA. anna@infosci.cornell.edu.

Scientific Reports
|February 6, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The Generalized Friendship Paradox, suggesting friends are more active, may not hold true when analyzing individual users (nodes) instead of network connections (edges). Network structure, not just activity correlation, determines if this paradox applies.

More Related Videos

Group Synchronization During Collaborative Drawing Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy
07:53

Group Synchronization During Collaborative Drawing Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy

Published on: August 5, 2022

2.1K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

781

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 11, 2025

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.4K
Group Synchronization During Collaborative Drawing Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy
07:53

Group Synchronization During Collaborative Drawing Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy

Published on: August 5, 2022

2.1K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

781

Area of Science:

  • Network Science
  • Sociology
  • Data Analysis

Background:

  • The Friendship Paradox states individuals have fewer friends than their friends do.
  • This concept extends to attributes like activity, suggesting friends are more active.
  • The network-level Generalized Friendship Paradox is mathematically established.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the node-based version of the Generalized Friendship Paradox.
  • To determine if attributes correlated with user degree always follow this paradox at the individual level.
  • To explore the influence of network structure on this phenomenon.

Main Methods:

  • Mathematical analysis of network structures.
  • Comparison of edge-based aggregation versus node-based aggregation.
  • Examination of degree-attribute correlations.

Main Results:

  • The node-based Generalized Friendship Paradox may fail, even with high degree-attribute correlations.
  • The paradox's validity depends on both correlation strength and underlying network topology.
  • It is not a universal phenomenon across all social networks.

Conclusions:

  • The node-based Generalized Friendship Paradox is not universally applicable.
  • Network structure plays a critical role in its manifestation.
  • Findings have implications for interpreting social network data and user behavior.