Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 11, 2025

In vivo Macrophage Imaging Using MR Targeted Contrast Agent for Longitudinal Evaluation of Septic Arthritis
Published on: October 20, 2013
Intermediate-weighted MRI with fat suppression (IW-FS): diagnostic performance for bone marrow edema and erosion
Min Chen1,2, Keyan Yu1, Xuehan Hu1,2
1Department of Radiology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, PR China.
Background:
Bone marrow edema (BME) and erosion of the sacroiliac joint are both key lesions for diagnosing axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
Purpose:
To qualitatively and quantitatively compare intermediate-weighted MRI with fat suppression (IW-FS) with T2-weighted short tau inversion recovery (T2-STIR) in assessment of sacroiliac BME and erosion in axSpA.
Material And Methods:
Patients aged 18-60 years with axSpA were prospectively enrolled. All patients underwent a 3.0-T MRI examination of the sacroiliac joints. Para-coronal IW-FS, T2-STIR, and T1-weighted (T1W) images were acquired. BME and erosion were scored by two readers in consensus on IW-FS and STIR using a modified Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) scoring system. Consensus scores on T1WI were used as the reference for erosion. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were measured for BME.
Results:
In total, 49 patients (mean age=33.4 ± 7.6 years) were included. More patients were scored as having BME on T2-STIR (36 vs. 29, P = 0.016). SPARCC-BME score on IW-FS was lower than that acquired on T2-STIR (mean, 11.5 vs. 14.7, P = 0.002). SNR and CNR of BME were both lower on IW-FS than on T2-STIR (mean SNR, 118 vs. 218, P < 0.001; mean CNR, 44 vs. 137, P < 0.001). The sensitivity of erosion detection was higher on IW-FS (83%) than on T2-STIR (54%, P = 0.006).
Conclusion:
IW-FS is not sufficient for BME detection using T2-STIR as the reference standard in patients with axSpA. IW-FS has a much higher sensitivity than T2-STIR for erosion detection in the sacroiliac joint.
Insights
Intermediate-weighted MRI with fat suppression (IW-FS) shows lower sensitivity for detecting bone marrow edema (BME) compared to T2-STIR. However, IW-FS demonstrates superior sensitivity for identifying sacroiliac joint erosion in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA).
Area of Science:
- Radiology
- Rheumatology
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Bone marrow edema (BME) and sacroiliac joint erosion are crucial MRI indicators for diagnosing axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA).
- Accurate detection of these lesions is vital for timely diagnosis and management of axSpA.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare intermediate-weighted MRI with fat suppression (IW-FS) against T2-weighted short tau inversion recovery (T2-STIR) for assessing sacroiliac BME and erosion in axSpA.
- To evaluate both qualitative and quantitative differences between the two MRI sequences.
Main Methods:
- Prospective enrollment of 49 patients (aged 18-60) diagnosed with axSpA.
- Acquisition of 3.0-T MRI scans including para-coronal IW-FS, T2-STIR, and T1-weighted (T1W) images of the sacroiliac joints.
- Scoring of BME and erosion using a modified SPARCC system by two blinded readers, with T1W images serving as the reference for erosion.
- Measurement of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) for BME.
Main Results:
- T2-STIR identified BME in more patients (36) compared to IW-FS (29).
- The mean SPARCC-BME score was lower on IW-FS (11.5) than on T2-STIR (14.7).
- Both SNR and CNR for BME were significantly lower on IW-FS compared to T2-STIR.
- IW-FS demonstrated higher sensitivity for detecting sacroiliac joint erosion (83%) than T2-STIR (54%).
Conclusions:
- IW-FS alone is insufficient for BME detection when T2-STIR is considered the reference standard in axSpA patients.
- IW-FS offers significantly improved sensitivity for detecting sacroiliac joint erosion compared to T2-STIR.
Related Concept Videos
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Radiological Investigation II: MRI and Ventilation Perfusion Scan
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Ventilation Perfusion Scans are two radiological investigations that offer detailed diagnostic images of the body, particularly lung structures.
MRI
MRI uses magnetic fields and radiofrequency signals to distinguish between normal and abnormal tissues. This technology provides a more detailed diagnostic image than CT scans, enabling it to characterize pulmonary nodules, stage bronchogenic carcinoma, and evaluate inflammatory activity in...
Ultrasonography
During an ultrasonography procedure, a handheld device called...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging

