Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 11, 2025

FISH for Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis
Published on: February 23, 2011
Preimplantation genetic testing and child health: a national register-based study
Erica Ginström Ernstad1, Charles Hanson2, Kjell Wånggren3
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, East Hospital, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Insights
Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) is associated with comparable perinatal and early childhood health outcomes to in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI). However, PGT was linked to higher preterm birth rates compared to spontaneous conception.
Area of Science:
- Reproductive Medicine
- Genetics
- Pediatrics
Background:
- Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) is crucial for couples with genetic disorders, reducing offspring risk.
- PGT involves embryo biopsy and is combined with IVF/ICSI, raising questions about its safety.
- Limited data exists on PGT's long-term effects on perinatal and childhood health.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if PGT is associated with adverse perinatal and early childhood health outcomes.
- To compare outcomes of PGT-conceived children with those conceived via IVF/ICSI and spontaneous conception.
Main Methods:
- A Swedish register-based study included 390 singletons born after PGT and compared them to 61,060 after IVF/ICSI and 42,034 after spontaneous conception.
- Data were cross-linked from PGT centers and national health registers (Medical Birth Register, Patient Register, Cause of Death Register).
- Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyze perinatal outcomes, childhood morbidity, and maternal outcomes, adjusting for confounders.
Main Results:
- Perinatal outcomes (preterm birth, low birthweight) and birth defects were comparable between PGT and IVF/ICSI groups.
- Children born after PGT showed a higher risk of preterm birth compared to spontaneous conception.
- Early childhood health outcomes, including asthma and allergic disorders, were similar across PGT and IVF/ICSI groups; no PGT children died during follow-up.
Conclusions:
- The embryo biopsy in PGT does not appear to adversely affect perinatal, early childhood, or maternal outcomes compared to IVF/ICSI.
- While outcomes are comparable to IVF/ICSI, caution is advised due to small sample sizes and short follow-up.
- Further long-term follow-up studies are needed to fully assess the impact of PGT, given its invasive nature.
Study Question:
Is preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) associated with adverse perinatal outcome and early childhood health?
Summary Answer:
Children born after PGT had comparable perinatal outcomes to children born after IVF/ICSI and comparable findings regarding early childhood health.
What Is Known Already:
PGT is offered to couples affected by monogenic disorders (PGT-M) or inherited chromosomal aberrations (PGT-SR), limiting the risk of transferring the disorder to the offspring. PGT, an invasive technique, requires genetic analysis of one or up to ten cells from the embryo and is combined with IVF or ICSI. Several studies, most of them small, have shown comparable results after PGT and IVF/ICSI concerning perinatal outcome. Only a few studies with limited samples have been published on PGT and childhood health.
Study Design, Size, Duration:
We performed a register-based study including all singletons born after PGT (n = 390) in Sweden during 1 January 1996-30 September 2019. Singletons born after PGT were compared with all singletons born after IVF/ICSI (n = 61 060) born during the same period of time and with a matched sample of singletons (n = 42 034) born after spontaneous conception selected from the Medical Birth Register. Perinatal outcomes, early childhood health, and maternal outcomes were compared between pregnancies after PGT and IVF/ICSI as well as between pregnancies after PGT and spontaneous conception. Primary outcomes were preterm birth (PTB) and low birthweight (LBW) whereas childhood morbidity was the secondary outcome.
Participants/Materials, Setting, Methods:
Data on women who went through PGT and gave birth were obtained from the local databases at the two PGT centres in Sweden, whereas data on IVF treatment for the IVF/ICSI group were obtained from the national IVF registers. These data were then cross-linked to national health registers; the Medical Birth Register, the Patient Register, and the Cause of Death Register. Logistic multivariable regression analysis and Cox proportional hazards models were performed with adjustment for relevant confounders.
Main Results And The Role Of Chance:
The mean follow-up time was 4.6 years for children born after PGT and 5.1 years for children born after spontaneous conception, whereas the mean follow-up time was 9.0 years for children born after IVF/ICSI. For perinatal outcomes, PTB occurred in 7.7% of children after PGT and in 7.3% of children after IVF/ICSI, whereas the rates were 4.9% and 5.2% for LBW (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 1.22, 95% CI 0.82-1.81 and AOR 1.17, 95% CI 0.71-1.91, respectively). No differences were observed for birth defects. In comparison to spontaneous conception, children born after PGT had a higher risk for PTB (AOR 1.73, 95% CI 1.17-2.58). Regarding early childhood health, the absolute risk of asthma was 38/390 (9.7%) in children born after PGT and 6980/61 060 (11.4%) in children born after in IVF/ICSI, whereas the corresponding numbers were 34/390 (8.7%) and 7505/61 060 (12.3%) for allergic disorders. Following Cox proportional hazards models, no significant differences were found for these outcomes. Sepsis, hypothyroidism, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, autism spectrum disorders, mental retardation, cerebral palsy, and epilepsy were diagnosed in a maximum of three PGT children. No PGT children died during the follow-up period. Regarding maternal outcomes, the rates of placenta praevia and caesarean delivery were significantly higher after PGT in comparison to spontaneous conception (AOR 6.46, 95% CI 3.38-12.37 and AOR 1.52, 95% CI 1.20-1.92, respectively), whereas no differences were seen comparing pregnancies after PGT and IVF/ICSI.
Limitations, Reasons For Caution:
The rather small sample size of children born after PGT made it impossible to adjust for all relevant confounders including fertilization method and culture duration. Moreover, the follow-up time was short for most of the children especially in the PGT group, probably lowering the absolute number of diagnoses in early childhood.
Wider Implications Of The Findings:
The results are reassuring and indicate that the embryo biopsy itself has no adverse effect on the perinatal, early childhood, or maternal outcomes. Although the results are comparable to IVF/ICSI also regarding early childhood outcome, they should be taken with caution due to the low number of children with diagnoses and short follow-up time. Long-term follow-up studies on children born after PGT are scarce and should be conducted considering the invasiveness of the technique.
Study Funding/Competing Interest(S):
The study was financed by grants from the Swedish state under the agreement between the Swedish government and the county councils, the ALF-agreement (LUA/ALF 70940), the Board of National Specialised Medical Care at Sahlgrenska University Hospital and Hjalmar Svensson Research Foundation. There are no conflicts of interest to declare.
Trial Registration Number:
N/A.
Related Concept Videos
Genomic Imprinting and Inheritance
The expression of some genes depends on which parent passed the gene to the offspring, through a phenomenon known as...
Behavioral Genetics and Its Designs
The primary methodologies used in behavior genetics include family studies, twin studies, and adoption studies, each providing unique...
CRISPR

