Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

593
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
593
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

448
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
448
The Availability Heuristic01:08

The Availability Heuristic

6.1K
A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):
6.1K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I01:30

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

410
The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
410
Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

11.0K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
11.0K
Deductive Reasoning01:16

Deductive Reasoning

56.3K
Deductive reasoning, or deduction, is the type of logic used in hypothesis-based science. In deductive reasoning, the pattern of thinking moves in the opposite direction as compared to inductive reasoning, which means that it uses a general principle or law to predict specific results. From those general principles, a scientist can deduce and predict the specific results that would be valid as long as the general principles are valid.
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
56.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Prevalence of Bruxism and Its Association With Sleep Disturbances, Anxiety, and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Special care in dentistry : official publication of the American Association of Hospital Dentists, the Academy of Dentistry for the Handicapped, and the American Society for Geriatric Dentistry·2026
Same author

Cohort and Case-Control Studies: Strengths, Limitations and Methodological Considerations.

Journal of periodontal research·2026
Same authorSame journal

The Effect of Prematurity on the Occurrence of Caries at Four Years of Age: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Community dentistry and oral epidemiology·2026
Same author

Can the Relationship Between Breastfeeding and Malocclusion in Primary Dentition Change According to Pacifier Use Duration and Intensity? Evidence From a Birth Cohort Study.

Community dentistry and oral epidemiology·2026
Same author

Self-reported sexual assault and dental service use among adolescents: The moderating role of dental pain.

European journal of oral sciences·2026
Same author

The Use of Silver Fluoride for Oral Health and Well-Being in Aged Care Residents: Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.

JMIR research protocols·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 11, 2025

A Finite Element Approach for Locating the Center of Resistance of Maxillary Teeth
10:50

A Finite Element Approach for Locating the Center of Resistance of Maxillary Teeth

Published on: April 8, 2020

9.7K

Causal inference in dentistry: Time to move forward.

Helena Silveira Schuch1,2, Gustavo Giacomelli Nascimento3,4,5, Flávio Fernando Demarco1,6

  • 1Graduate Program in Dentistry, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.

Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology
|February 7, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Causal inference is vital for oral health research, moving beyond correlation to identify disease causes for effective interventions. Embracing causal thinking and methods can improve public health outcomes.

Keywords:
causalityepidemiologic methodsmethodsoral healthpopulation healthrisk factorsstatistical data interpretation

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization
05:49

Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization

Published on: February 23, 2024

929
Digital Hybrid Model Preparation for Virtual Planning of Reconstructive Dentoalveolar Surgical Procedures
09:10

Digital Hybrid Model Preparation for Virtual Planning of Reconstructive Dentoalveolar Surgical Procedures

Published on: August 5, 2021

1.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 11, 2025

A Finite Element Approach for Locating the Center of Resistance of Maxillary Teeth
10:50

A Finite Element Approach for Locating the Center of Resistance of Maxillary Teeth

Published on: April 8, 2020

9.7K
Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization
05:49

Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization

Published on: February 23, 2024

929
Digital Hybrid Model Preparation for Virtual Planning of Reconstructive Dentoalveolar Surgical Procedures
09:10

Digital Hybrid Model Preparation for Virtual Planning of Reconstructive Dentoalveolar Surgical Procedures

Published on: August 5, 2021

1.8K

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Epidemiology
  • Dental Research

Background:

  • Oral conditions pose a significant public health challenge.
  • Current oral health studies often lack methodological rigor, limiting the interpretation and application of findings.
  • Causal inference is crucial for developing and testing effective preventive oral health interventions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To advocate for the increased use of causal inference in oral health research.
  • To emphasize the importance of theoretically sound questions and explicit causal relationships in study design.
  • To promote a shift towards more meaningful research and improved public health interventions.

Main Methods:

  • Focus on asking theoretically sound causal questions.
  • Explicitly define and measure causal relationships.
  • Utilize high-quality observational studies to estimate average causal effects.
  • Employ triangulation of results from diverse data sources and methods.

Main Results:

  • Methodological deficiencies in current oral health studies hinder progress.
  • Causal inference allows for quantification of intervention effects and informs policy.
  • High-quality observational data can yield reliable causal effect estimates.

Conclusions:

  • A systematic and structural change in the field is necessary for substantial progress.
  • Scientific societies, funding bodies, dental schools, and journals should promote causal inference.
  • Researchers must engage with communities, co-produce research, and translate findings for public health impact.