Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 11, 2025

05:32
Retrospective Cardiac Gating with A Prototype Small-Animal X-ray Computed Tomograph
Published on: February 21, 2025
360
Comparison of deep learning-based denoising methods in cardiac SPECT
Antti Sohlberg1,2, Tuija Kangasmaa3, Chris Constable4
1Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Päijät-Häme Central Hospital, Lahti, Finland. antti.sohlberg@phhyky.fi.
EJNMMI Physics
|February 8, 2023
Summary
Deep learning models effectively reduce noise in myocardial perfusion SPECT (MPS) images. While improving image quality, some models slightly decreased perfusion defect detection accuracy compared to standard methods.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging
- Artificial Intelligence
- Cardiology
Background:
- Myocardial perfusion SPECT (MPS) images are prone to noise artifacts from low-count statistics, potentially leading to misdiagnosis.
- Deep learning (DL) offers a promising solution for denoising MPS images and improving diagnostic accuracy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the performance of various deep learning (DL) denoising models for myocardial perfusion SPECT (MPS) images.
- To evaluate the impact of DL denoising on image quality, noise levels, and defect detection.
Main Methods:
- Four DL models (CNN, RES, UNET, cGAN) were trained on MPS data reconstructed with varying acquisition times.
- Methods were compared against each other and standard reconstruction (OSEM) using noise metrics (CoV), image similarity (SSIM), and ROC analysis for defect detection.
Main Results:
- All DL methods significantly reduced noise compared to OSEM. CNN, RES, and UNET showed comparable defect detection performance to full-time acquisition, while cGAN had the lowest noise but also the poorest detection.
- DL denoising improved image quality and uniformity, though SSIM was higher with reduced acquisition time OSEM.
Conclusions:
- DL-based denoising enhances noise reduction in MPS imaging, with some models maintaining high diagnostic performance.
- Conditional GAN (cGAN) achieved the lowest noise levels but demonstrated the weakest defect detection among the evaluated DL methods.

