Electronic Effect on Phenoxide Migration at a Nickel(II) Center Supported by a Tridentate...

A phosphide nickel(II) phenoxide pincer complex (2) reacts with CO(g) to give a pseudo-tetrahedral nickel(0) monocarbonyl complex (3) possessing a phosphinite moiety. This metal-ligand cooperative (MLC) transformation occurs with a (PPP)Ni scaffold (PPP^- = P[2-PPr₂-C₆H₄]₂^-), which can accommodate both square planar and tetrahedral geometries. The 2-electron reduction of a nickel(II) species induced by CO coordination involves group transfer to generate a P-O bond. For better mechanistic understanding, a series of nickel(II) phenolate complexes (2a-2e, XC₆H₄O^- (X = OMe, Me, H, and CF₃) and pentafluorophenolate) were prepared. Kinetic experimental data reveal that a phenolate species with an electron-withdrawing group reacts faster than those with electron-donating groups. The reaction kinetic experiments were conducted in pseudo-first order conditions at room temperature monitored by UV-vis spectroscopy. A pentafluorophenolate nickel(II) complex (2e) reveals instantaneous reactions even at -40 °C to give a nickel(0) monocarbonyl species (3e) and the reverse reaction is also possible. According to kinetic experiments, the rate determining step (RDS) would be the formation of a 5-coordinate intermediate 4 with a negative entropy value (ΔS^‡ < 0), and a positive ρ value based on the Hammett plot indicates that the electron-deficient phenolate leads to a faster CO association. Furthermore, scramble experiments suggest that phenolate de-coordinates from the intermediate 4, which gives a (PPP)Ni-CO species 6. The cationic nickel monocarbonyl intermediate can possess a P^--Ni(II), P•-Ni(I), or even a P⁺-Ni(0) character. Such an inner-sphere electron transfer is suggested when a π-acidic ligand such as CO coordinates to a metal ion. Another possible reaction is homolysis of a Ni-O bond to give P^--Ni(I) or P•-Ni(0), when a phenoxyl radical is liberated. Considering the P-O bond formation, closed-shell nucleophilic and open-shell radical pathways are suggested. A phenolate pathway reveals a lower energy state for 2e relative to other complexes (2c and 2d), while its radical pathway undergoes via a higher energy state. Therefore, the formation of a P-O bond may occur with the binding of a closed-shell phenolate to the electron-deficient P center.