Personalized pain management: Is it time for process-based therapy for particular people with chronic pain?

Psychological treatments for chronic pain have helped many people around the world. They are among the most researched and best evidenced treatments a person can receive when they have persistent, disabling and distressing pain. At the same time, improvements in the effectiveness of these treatments appear to be at a standstill. This may be due to an inherent lack of generalizability from aggregated group data to the individual, limited utility of our current schemes for categorizing people with pain conditions, faced with their inherent heterogeneity, our relatively coarse categories of treatment types and focus on treatment packages rather than individual methods, and our current failures to find adequate predictors of outcome, or to assign people their best-suited treatment methods, based on group data. In this review, it is argued that the development and examination of truly personalized treatment is a next logical step to create progress and improve the results people achieve.

Key research studies pertaining to psychological treatments, treatment outcome, heterogeneity in chronic pain, prediction of treatment outcome, subtyping and treatment tailoring are reviewed.

It is suggested that development of future treatments for chronic pain ought to incorporate an idiographic, process-based approach, focused on evidence-based mechanisms of change, individually and dynamically addressed, based on contextually sensitive ongoing assessment. Knowledge and practical solutions needed to make process-based therapy for chronic pain happen are discussed.

Psychological approaches to chronic pain have been highly successful in the past but improvement in the effectiveness of these over time is slow to nonexistent. It is argued here that this has happened due to a failure to adequately consider the individual. Future psychological treatments for chronic pain ought to incorporate an idiographic, process-based approach, focused on evidence-based mechanisms of change, individually and dynamically addressed, grounded in ongoing contextually sensitive assessment.