Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

23.1K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
23.1K
Blind Procedures02:07

Blind Procedures

10.7K
Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which...
10.7K
Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

6.3K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
6.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Take Care: development and evaluation of a serious game about violence against children and adolescents.

Revista latino-americana de enfermagem·2026
Same author

Time series and factors associated with prematurity in live births in curitiba, brazil: time series analysis between the years 2000 and 2021.

BMC pregnancy and childbirth·2025
Same author

Process mining to identify average time patterns of changes in FAMACHA© scores in ewes and guide monitoring intervals.

Veterinary parasitology·2025
Same author

Childhood and adolescence in mental health policy: an analysis through health counselors and conferences.

Ciencia & saude coletiva·2024
Same author

Fostering Digital Health in Universities: An Experience of the First Junior Scientific Committee of the Brazilian Congress of Health Informatics.

Healthcare informatics research·2024
Same author

Is it possible to automate the discovery of process maps for the time-driven activity-based costing method? A systematic review.

BMC health services research·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 11, 2025

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

8.6K

Deception detection with machine learning: A systematic review and statistical analysis.

Alex Sebastião Constâncio1, Denise Fukumi Tsunoda1, Helena de Fátima Nunes Silva1

  • 1PPGGI, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, State of Paraná, Brazil.

Plos One
|February 9, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Machine learning for deception detection is advancing, with multimodal approaches trending. However, labeled datasets, especially for non-English languages, remain scarce, highlighting areas for future research in AI-driven lie detection.

More Related Videos

Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification
08:05

Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification

Published on: April 6, 2020

10.8K
A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 11, 2025

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

8.6K
Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification
08:05

Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification

Published on: April 6, 2020

10.8K
A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.6K

Area of Science:

  • Computer Science
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Psychology

Background:

  • The field of Machine Learning (ML) for deception detection has seen significant growth over the last decade, resulting in a complex landscape of methodologies and findings.
  • Identifying clear trends, successful strategies, research gaps, and opportunities for novel contributions in this domain can be challenging for researchers.

Approach:

  • This literature review systematically analyzed 648 articles retrieved from major databases (ACM, IEEE, Scopus, Web of Science) following the PRISMA protocol.
  • A final corpus of 81 documents was summarized using mind maps, with metadata encoded for statistical analysis using Python and Jupyter Lab Notebooks, all publicly available.
  • The five most prevalent ML techniques identified were Neural Networks, Support Vector Machines, Random Forest, Decision Tree, and K-nearest Neighbor.

Key Points:

  • Deception detection performance varied widely (51%-100%), with 19 studies achieving accuracy above 0.9.
  • While monomodal approaches exist, bimodal and multimodal strategies are increasingly trending, often yielding higher accuracy in deception detection.
  • Research predominantly focuses on English language data (75%), with limited exploration of linguistic features across diverse languages and cultures.

Conclusions:

  • A critical limitation is the scarcity of labeled datasets derived from real-world scenarios for training ML models.
  • There is substantial opportunity for developing novel ML approaches for deception detection, particularly those focusing on languages and cultural contexts beyond English.
  • Future research should prioritize the creation of new, labeled, multimodal datasets to advance the accuracy and generalizability of AI-based deception detection systems.