Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 11, 2025

Conducting Respiratory Oscillometry in an Outpatient Setting
Published on: April 8, 2022
Minimal clinically important difference for impulse oscillometry in adults with asthma
Mustafa Abdo1, Anne-Marie Kirsten2, Erika von Mutius3,4
1LungenClinic Grosshansdorf, Airway Research Center North (ARCN), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Grosshansdorf, Germany m.abdo@lungenclinic.de.
Background:
Impulse oscillometry (IOS) allows an effort-independent evaluation of small airway function in asthma. Unfortunately, well-determined minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) for IOS measures are lacking. Here, we provide MCIDs for frequently used IOS measures, namely frequency dependence of resistance (FDR) and area of reactance (AX), in patients with asthma.
Methods:
We performed IOS at baseline and 1 year later in adult patients with mild-to-severe asthma (n=235). In a two-step approach, we first applied a distribution-based method to statistically determine the MCID. Next, we validated the proposed MCID according to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), Asthma Control Questionnaire-7 (ACQ-7) and Asthma Control Test (ACT). We used multivariable analyses to investigate the proposed MCIDs as predictors for improvements in PROMs compared with the established MCID of forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1).
Results:
The proposed MCID was a decline of ≥0.06 kPa·L-1·s-1 and ≥0.65 kPa·L-1 for FDR and AX, respectively. Patients who had changes beyond the MCIDs for both FDR and AX showed greater improvements in all PROMs than those who had not. The mean improvements in PROMs were beyond the established MCIDs for ACQ-7 and AQLQ, and approximated the MCID for ACT. Multivariable analyses demonstrated the MCIDs for both FDR and AX as independent predictors for the MCIDs of all PROMs. The MCID for FDR was a stronger predictor of all PROMs than the MCID for FEV1.
Conclusions:
This study provides MCIDs for IOS-derived measures in adult patients with asthma and emphasises that small airway function is a distinguished end-point beyond the conventional measure of FEV1.
More Related Videos
06:11Employing the Forced Oscillation Technique for the Assessment of Respiratory Mechanics in Adults
Published on: February 9, 2022
08:35Oxygenation-sensitive Cardiac MRI with Vasoactive Breathing Maneuvers for the Non-invasive Assessment of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction
Published on: August 17, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Measurement of Blood Pressure
Asthma-IV: Diagnostic and Management
Clinical Assessment for Asthma:
This is the first step in diagnosing and managing asthma. It includes:
Special considerations while measuring oxygen saturation
Ensuring accuracy in vital sign recordings while prioritizing patient comfort and minimizing anxiety is...
Asthma-II: Pathophysiology and Classification
Additionally, environmental and genetic factors play crucial roles in determining an individual's susceptibility to asthma and the severity of their condition.
Critical processes in asthma pathophysiology include:
Pulse Oximetry
Purpose
Average SpO2 values are greater than 95%. If the readings fall below 90%, it indicates that...
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.