Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 11, 2025

Author Spotlight: Innovations in iTUG Test for Enhanced Risk Assessment and Cognitive Insights
Published on: October 25, 2024
Investigating accountability for Artificial Intelligence through risk governance: A workshop-based exploratory study
Ellen Hohma1, Auxane Boch1, Rainer Trauth2
1School of Social Sciences and Technology, Institute for Ethics in AI, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Developing AI accountability requires practical strategies. This study identifies key characteristics for AI risk management, aiming to bridge the gap between AI concepts and industry practice for better governance.
Area of Science:
- Computer Science
- Artificial Intelligence
- Risk Management
Background:
- The increasing prevalence of AI systems necessitates robust accountability frameworks.
- Existing regulations and standards highlight the importance of addressing AI consequences.
- A gap exists in practical strategies for AI accountability among practitioners.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the applicability of risk governance methods for AI accountability.
- To identify challenges faced by AI practitioners in accountability and risk management.
- To contribute practical solutions for AI accountability in industry.
Main Methods:
- An exploratory workshop-based methodology was employed.
- AI practitioners from academia and industry participated.
- Interactive study design to gather insights on AI risk handling.
Main Results:
- Identified 5 essential characteristics for AI risk management methodologies: balance, extendability, representation, transparency, and long-term orientation.
- Highlighted the need for clearer definitions of risk and accountability.
- Demanded standardization in risk governance and management for AI.
Conclusions:
- Moving AI accountability from a conceptual to a practical stage requires defined characteristics and actions.
- Addressing practical challenges in AI risk management is crucial for industry adoption.
- Standardization and clear definitions are vital for effective AI governance.
More Related Videos
05:30Introduction of an Integrated Pathology Image Management, Artificial Intelligence, and Reporting System
Published on: July 11, 2025
05:47Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
Published on: June 13, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Accountability and Responsibility of a Nurse I
Non-equilibrium in the Cell
Accountability and Responsibility of a Nurse II
For example, a nurse demonstrating respect and compassion might listen attentively to a patient's concerns, provide...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Drug Control Governance: Regulatory Bodies and Their Impact
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...