Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Testing Water Quality01:14

Testing Water Quality

156
When the quality of water for concrete preparation is uncertain, its impact on the setting time of cement and compressive strength of mortar is assessed by comparison with de-ionized or distilled water benchmarks. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) C1602 requires the setting times to be within 90 minutes of the control, British Standard (BS) 3146:1980 allows a 30-minute variance in the initial setting, while British Standards European Norm (BS EN) 1008 specifies initial setting...
156
Sampling Methods: Sample Types01:18

Sampling Methods: Sample Types

321
Sampling materials are classified into three main types: solid, liquid, and gas.
Solid samples include a variety of substances, such as sediments from water bodies, soil, metals, and biological tissues. Two standard methods for extracting sediments from water bodies are grab sampling and piston coring. Grab sampling involves using a device to collect a discrete sediment sample from the bottom of a water body with minimal disturbance. Grab samples do not always represent the entire area due to...
321

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Background asbestos fiber levels in autopsy lungs: Implications for forensic disease attribution in the post-ban era.

Medicine, science, and the law·2026
Same author

Observing the mechanism of delayed collapse in colloidal gels: Yielding while becoming stronger.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

The Combined Role of Silanols and Oxidative Stress in Determining Engineered Stone Dust Toxicity.

ACS organic & inorganic Au·2026
Same author

Critical surface phase behavior governs hydrophobic attraction between extended solutes.

The Journal of chemical physics·2025
Same author

Potential pulmonary toxic effects of Martian dust simulant.

iScience·2025
Same author

Absence of phagolysosomal activation and high clearance efficiency define the low pulmonary toxicity of short asbestos fibers.

Journal of hazardous materials·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 10, 2025

Clean Sampling and Analysis of River and Estuarine Waters for Trace Metal Studies
10:44

Clean Sampling and Analysis of River and Estuarine Waters for Trace Metal Studies

Published on: July 1, 2016

11.5K

Waterborne asbestos: Good practices for surface waters analyses.

Chiara Avataneo1,2, Silvana Capella1,2, Mariagrazia Luiso3

  • 1Department of Earth Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

Frontiers in Chemistry
|February 10, 2023
PubMed
Summary

This study found that current analytical methods for detecting asbestos in water samples lack reproducibility. Improving these methods is crucial for accurate environmental monitoring and public health protection regarding asbestos exposure.

Keywords:
analytical methodsasbestos analysisguidelinessurface waterswaterborne asbestos

More Related Videos

Extraction and Detection of Geosmin and 2-Methylisoborneol in Water and Fish using High-Capacity Sorptive Extraction Probes and GC-MS
11:59

Extraction and Detection of Geosmin and 2-Methylisoborneol in Water and Fish using High-Capacity Sorptive Extraction Probes and GC-MS

Published on: July 3, 2025

448
Sampling, Sorting, and Characterizing Microplastics in Aquatic Environments with High Suspended Sediment Loads and Large Floating Debris
05:31

Sampling, Sorting, and Characterizing Microplastics in Aquatic Environments with High Suspended Sediment Loads and Large Floating Debris

Published on: July 28, 2018

16.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 10, 2025

Clean Sampling and Analysis of River and Estuarine Waters for Trace Metal Studies
10:44

Clean Sampling and Analysis of River and Estuarine Waters for Trace Metal Studies

Published on: July 1, 2016

11.5K
Extraction and Detection of Geosmin and 2-Methylisoborneol in Water and Fish using High-Capacity Sorptive Extraction Probes and GC-MS
11:59

Extraction and Detection of Geosmin and 2-Methylisoborneol in Water and Fish using High-Capacity Sorptive Extraction Probes and GC-MS

Published on: July 3, 2025

448
Sampling, Sorting, and Characterizing Microplastics in Aquatic Environments with High Suspended Sediment Loads and Large Floating Debris
05:31

Sampling, Sorting, and Characterizing Microplastics in Aquatic Environments with High Suspended Sediment Loads and Large Floating Debris

Published on: July 28, 2018

16.1K

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Science
  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Mineralogy

Background:

  • Asbestos monitoring has historically focused on air, with limited attention to water matrices.
  • Waterborne asbestos poses non-conventional exposure risks and can be a source of airborne asbestos through water-to-air migration.
  • Regulatory approaches for studying waterborne asbestos are fragmented due to scarce research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To test the reliability and interlaboratory reproducibility of an existing analytical method for natural waters.
  • To identify error-prone steps in the analytical protocol for waterborne asbestos detection.
  • To propose best practices for reliable asbestos analysis in surface water samples.

Main Methods:

  • Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) analysis of a standard chrysotile sample in a water matrix.
  • Mimicking stream water conditions as per the Piedmont Environmental Protection Agency protocol.
  • Testing the method with different operators and analytical setups to assess reproducibility.

Main Results:

  • Three datasets generated from the same sample exhibited low interlaboratory reproducibility.
  • Variability in results suggests potential issues with the current analytical protocol.
  • Specific analytical steps contributing to discrepancies were identified and discussed.

Conclusions:

  • The existing analytical method for waterborne asbestos shows poor reproducibility.
  • Standardization and refinement of analytical protocols are necessary for reliable detection.
  • Proposed good practices aim to improve regulatory consistency and accuracy in asbestos monitoring in water.