A Pilot Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Neuroprotective Studies in Female Rodent Models of Ischemic Stroke

Most ischemic stroke (IS) patients go untreated due to limited treatment windows, restrictive eligibility criteria, and poor availability of current clinical therapies. Neuroprotective treatments targeting protracted neurodegeneration are needed yet keep failing in clinical trials. Over half of IS patients are female, and the scarcity of neuroprotective studies using female animals hinders translational success. This pilot review and meta-analysis assessed the relationship between the risk of bias and efficacy of studies testing post-ischemic neuroprotective therapies using female rodent models of IS. We carried out a systematic search of the PubMed database for studies published between 1999 and May 2022, used the CAMARADES checklist to evaluate study quality, and extracted data pertaining to lesion volume and behavioral assessment. We found that 34 studies met our inclusion criteria, with pooled effect sizes depicting a significant treatment effect. However, researchers used mostly healthy young females, administered therapies within short time windows, ignored hormonal influences, and did not assess long-term outcomes. Interestingly, studies failing to report factors impacting internal validity, such as blinding and random allocation, had inflated effect sizes or did not reach statistical significance. There was also a relationship between low study quality and larger effect sizes for functional outcome, stressing the need to follow the existing translational design, reporting, and data analysis guidelines. In this review, we cover previous recommendations and offer our own in hopes that rigorous and meticulous research using female animal models of IS will increase our chances of successful bench-to-bedside translation.