Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 10, 2025

Pathological Analysis of Lung Metastasis Following Lateral Tail-Vein Injection of Tumor Cells
Published on: May 20, 2020
[Clinical Analysis of Pulmonary Lymphoma]
1School of Clinical Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, Jiangsu Province, China.Department of Hematology, Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, Jiangsu Province, China.Department of Respiration, Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, Jiangsu Province, China.
Objective:
To study the clinical, imaging, and pathological features of pulmonary lymphoma.
Methods:
Patients with pulmonary lymphoma diagnosed by lung biopsy in Zhongda Hospital Affiliated to Southeast University from November 2013 to December 2020 were collected and divided into secondary pulmonary lymphoma (SPL) group and primary pulmonary lymphoma (PPL) group according to the primary site of lymphoma. The clinical characteristics, stages, imaging features, diagnostic methods and pathological types of the two groups were analyzed.
Results:
A total of 22 patients were included, 10 cases were PPL and 12 cases were SPL. The main symptoms of the two groups were cough, dyspnea and chest pain. The proportion of stage III/IV patients and international prognostic index (IPI) in SPL group were significantly higher than those in PPL group (P<0.05). Chest high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) mainly showed masses, nodules and consolidation in both groups. The proportions of single mass and air bronchial sign in PPL group were significantly higher than those in SPL group, while the proportions of multiple nodules, mediastinal/hilar lymphadenopathy and pleural effusion were significantly lower (P<0.05). The max standardized uptake value (SUVmax), peak standardized uptake value (SUVpeak), total lesion glycolysis (TLG) and metabolic tumor volume (MTV) of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in PPL group were lower than those in SPL group, but the differences were not statistically significant (P>0.05). In PPL group, 8 cases were diagnosed by transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB) and 2 cases by percutaneous lung puncture. In SPL group, 4 cases were diagnosed by TBLB, 7 cases by percutaneous lung puncture, and 1 case by surgery. 95.5% patients were diagnosed by non-surgical methods. The main pathological type of PPL was mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma, while that of SPL was diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (P<0.05).
Conclusion:
The clinical symptoms of pulmonary lymphoma are nonspecific, but the chest HRCT has characteristic manifestations, which can also help to distinguish between SPL and PPL. 18F-FDG PET/CT is also a potential method to distinguish between SPL and PPL. TBLB and percutaneous lung puncture biopsy are reliable methods for the diagnosis of lung lymphoma. The main pathological type of PPL is MALT lymphoma, while that of SPL is diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
More Related Videos
07:44Practical Considerations in Studying Metastatic Lung Colonization in Osteosarcoma Using the Pulmonary Metastasis Assay
Published on: March 12, 2018
10:04Analysis of 18FDG PET/CT Imaging as a Tool for Studying Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection and Treatment in Non-human Primates
Published on: September 5, 2017