Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 10, 2025

A Novel Digital Platform for a Monitored Home-based Cardiac Rehabilitation Program
Published on: April 19, 2019
Adapting an In-Home Randomized Intervention Trial Protocol for COVID-19 Precautions
Shir Lerman Ginzburg1, Teresa Vazquez-Dodero2, Chermaine Mason2
1Department of Public Health, School of Arts and Sciences, MCPHS University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Researchers adapted in-home clinical trials for COVID-19 safety by minimizing contact during data collection. This ensured ethical research practices and participant well-being, demonstrating flexibility in public health studies.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Health
- Clinical Trials
- Public Health
Background:
- The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated modifications to clinical trial protocols, particularly for studies involving in-person data collection.
- The Home Air Filtration for Traffic-Related Air Pollution (HAFTRAP) study, a randomized crossover trial, required protocol revisions due to its pre-pandemic design involving home visits.
- Adapting in-home research during the pandemic presented unique challenges to participant and staff safety.
Purpose of the Study:
- To revise the HAFTRAP study protocol to ensure participant and staff safety during the COVID-19 pandemic.
- To explore methods for conducting in-home data collection with minimal contact.
- To maintain ethical and safe research practices while continuing a public health trial.
Main Methods:
- Postponed trial recruitment and revised the protocol, implementing enhanced safety precautions for home visits.
- Developed alternative approaches for installing air filtration units to minimize entry into participants' homes.
- Created a comprehensive COVID-19 safety plan for field staff and participants.
Main Results:
- Minimized participant contact during the placement of air filtration units, air quality monitoring, and collection of biological samples (blood pressure, phlebotomy).
- Adapted screening, consent, and follow-up questionnaires for reduced in-person interaction.
- Observed that perceived risk of COVID-19 infection influenced participant enrollment, especially early in the pandemic.
Conclusions:
- High-quality air monitoring data can be collected with minimal in-person contact without compromising trial integrity.
- Blood pressure and phlebotomy data were successfully collected with minimal risk to participants.
- Flexibility and collaboration were crucial for adapting in-home data collection methods to evolving safety guidelines.
More Related Videos
09:33Visualizing Field Data Collection Procedures of Exposure and Biomarker Assessments for the Household Air Pollution Intervention Network Trial in India
Published on: December 23, 2022
15:00Setup of Consumer Wearable Devices for Exposure and Health Monitoring in Population Studies
Published on: February 3, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Transmission-based Precautions II: Airborne and Protective Environment
Airborne precautions:
Use airborne precautions when treating patients known or suspected to have diseases that spread through the air—for example, tuberculosis or measles. These organisms are present in smaller droplets expelled by an infected person and...
Controls in Experiments
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Transmission-based Precautions I: Contact, Enteric, and Droplets
Contact Precautions:
Contact precautions are the measures taken to prevent the transmission of infectious agents, especially epidemiologically important microorganisms such as MRSA or influenza, primarily transmitted through direct or indirect contact with an...
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...