Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Three-Dimensional Force System:Problem Solving01:30

Three-Dimensional Force System:Problem Solving

707
A three-dimensional force system refers to a scenario in which three forces act simultaneously in three different directions. This type of problem is commonly encountered in physics and engineering, where it is necessary to calculate the resultant force on the system, which can then be used to predict or analyze the behavior of the object or structure under consideration.
To solve a three-dimensional force system, first resolve each force into its respective scalar components. Do this using...
707
Three-Dimensional Force System01:30

Three-Dimensional Force System

2.1K
In mechanical engineering, a three-dimensional force system is a system of forces acting in three dimensions, with forces applied along the x, y, and z coordinate axes. The three-dimensional force system is an important concept in mechanical engineering, as it allows engineers to understand and analyze the behavior of objects and structures in three dimensions. By understanding the forces acting on a system, engineers can design more efficient and effective mechanical systems that can withstand...
2.1K
Two-Dimensional Force System01:20

Two-Dimensional Force System

969
A two-dimensional system in mechanical engineering involves the analysis of motion and forces in a plane. A two-dimensional force vector can be resolved into its components as:
969
Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors01:17

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors

105
A survey team is tasked with determining the elevation difference between points Point A and Point B, separated by uneven terrain. They use a leveling instrument and a leveling rod.Common MistakesMisreading the Rod: During a backsight reading at Point A, the instrumentman observes the rod partially obscured by tall grass. Instead of reading 1.135 m, they mistakenly record 1.735 m due to the misalignment of the crosshair with the wrong graduation. This error adds 0.600 m to all subsequent...
105
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

1.7K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
1.7K
Simplification of a Force and Couple System I01:18

Simplification of a Force and Couple System I

604
The concept of reducing a system of forces and couple moments to an equivalent system is essential in simplifying the analysis of rigid bodies. This reduction allows for more straightforward computation and understanding of the external effects produced by the system. In particular, systems with an equivalent resultant force and a resultant couple moment having perpendicular lines of action can be further reduced to a single equivalent resultant force acting along a new line of action. There...
604

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Development of an optimized parameter set for monovalent ions in the reference interaction site model of solvation.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same author

Lysine acetylation plays a role in RNA binding protein-regulated alternative pre-mRNA splicing.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

An interdisciplinary effort to integrate coding into science courses.

Nature computational science·2024
Same author

AmberTools.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2023
Same author

Molecular Dynamics Simulations of the Cardiac Ryanodine Receptor Type 2 (RyR2) Gating Mechanism.

The journal of physical chemistry. B·2022
Same author

Accelerating the 3D reference interaction site model theory of molecular solvation with treecode summation and cut-offs.

Journal of computational chemistry·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 10, 2025

Optical Coherence Tomography Based Biomechanical Fluid-Structure Interaction Analysis of Coronary Atherosclerosis Progression
13:07

Optical Coherence Tomography Based Biomechanical Fluid-Structure Interaction Analysis of Coronary Atherosclerosis Progression

Published on: January 15, 2022

4.0K

Identifying Systematic Force Field Errors Using a 3D-RISM Element Counting Correction.

Lizet Casillas1, Vahe M Grigorian1, Tyler Luchko1

  • 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, California State University, Northridge, CA 91330, USA.

Molecules (Basel, Switzerland)
|February 11, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study identifies force field parameter errors in predicting small molecule hydration free energies using the 3D reference interaction site model (3D-RISM). Adjusting Lennard-Jones parameters in the general AMBER force field (GAFF) can improve accuracy across solvation models.

Keywords:
3D-RISMLennard–Jonesconformational samplingforce fieldgeneralized Bornhydration free energyimplicit solventpartial molar volumesolvationvolume correction

More Related Videos

A Method to Estimate Cadaveric Femur Cortical Strains During Fracture Testing Using Digital Image Correlation
09:34

A Method to Estimate Cadaveric Femur Cortical Strains During Fracture Testing Using Digital Image Correlation

Published on: September 14, 2017

7.5K
Fabrication and Implementation of a Reference-Free Traction Force Microscopy Platform
08:10

Fabrication and Implementation of a Reference-Free Traction Force Microscopy Platform

Published on: October 6, 2019

6.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 10, 2025

Optical Coherence Tomography Based Biomechanical Fluid-Structure Interaction Analysis of Coronary Atherosclerosis Progression
13:07

Optical Coherence Tomography Based Biomechanical Fluid-Structure Interaction Analysis of Coronary Atherosclerosis Progression

Published on: January 15, 2022

4.0K
A Method to Estimate Cadaveric Femur Cortical Strains During Fracture Testing Using Digital Image Correlation
09:34

A Method to Estimate Cadaveric Femur Cortical Strains During Fracture Testing Using Digital Image Correlation

Published on: September 14, 2017

7.5K
Fabrication and Implementation of a Reference-Free Traction Force Microscopy Platform
08:10

Fabrication and Implementation of a Reference-Free Traction Force Microscopy Platform

Published on: October 6, 2019

6.6K

Area of Science:

  • Computational chemistry
  • Molecular modeling
  • Physical chemistry

Background:

  • Hydration free energies are crucial benchmarks for solvation models.
  • Existing models often show errors due to inaccuracies in force fields, not solely solvation models.
  • The general AMBER force field (GAFF) requires refinement for accurate predictions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify inaccuracies in the general AMBER force field (GAFF) non-bond parameters.
  • To evaluate the performance of the 3D reference interaction site model (3D-RISM) with corrections for hydration free energy calculations.
  • To propose improvements for force field parameters based on systematic errors.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized the 3D reference interaction site model (3D-RISM) for calculating hydration free energies of 642 molecules from the FreeSolv database.
  • Applied partial molar volume correction (PMVC) and element count correction (ECC), individually and combined (PMVECC).
  • Analyzed systematic errors in parameters for molecules containing specific elements (Cl, Br, I, P).

Main Results:

  • The PMVECC approach achieved a mean unsigned error of 1.01±0.04 kcal/mol and RMSE of 1.44±0.07 kcal/mol.
  • This performance surpassed benchmark explicit solvent calculations from FreeSolv.
  • Identified systematic errors in GAFF parameters for molecules with Cl, Br, I, and P, consistent across methods.

Conclusions:

  • The 3D-RISM method with PMVECC offers a computationally efficient and accurate approach for hydration free energy prediction.
  • Systematic errors in GAFF parameters, particularly for halogens and phosphorus, are confirmed.
  • Minor adjustments to GAFF Lennard-Jones parameters are recommended to enhance hydration free energy predictions for all solvation models.