Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Professional Values01:29

Professional Values

6.7K
Nurses are responsible for caring for patients during birth, death, illness, and healing. Professional values guide the decisions and actions that nurses make in their careers. If nurses know the decisions and actions to take, providing patients with exceptional care is possible.
The values that are the foundation of the nursing profession are altruism, autonomy, human dignity, and social justice.
First, altruism refers to the concern for the welfare and well-being of others without personal...
6.7K
Ethical Issues01:27

Ethical Issues

1.1K
Nurses are essential in patient care, upholding the ethical principles of their profession and effectively navigating ethical dilemmas. Neglecting ethical issues can lead to inadequate patient care, compromised therapeutic relationships, and moral distress among healthcare workers.
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
1.1K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

5.6K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.6K
Ethical Dilemmas I01:17

Ethical Dilemmas I

991
Ethical dilemmas in nursing are of utmost importance, as they often arise from the tension between adhering to core ethical principles and the practical realities of healthcare delivery. These dilemmas require nurses to navigate complex situations where competing ethical considerations pull them in different directions.
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...
991
Persuasion Strategies01:52

Persuasion Strategies

38.8K
Researchers have tested many persuasion strategies, including the foot-in-the door and the door-in-the-face techniques, in a variety of contexts. Ultimately, the principles are effective in selling products and changing people’s attitude, ideas, and behaviors (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).
38.8K
Nursing Ethical Principles II01:27

Nursing Ethical Principles II

1.0K
Ethical principles are essential in guiding nurses to fulfill their responsibilities, focusing on the quality of nursing care and decision-making. These principles, including autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, justice, and fidelity, shape the ethical framework within healthcare settings.
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's...
1.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Fair processes for financing universal health coverage?

Health economics, policy, and law·2024
Same author

Proxy Preferences and the Values of Children's Health States.

PharmacoEconomics·2024
Same author

Problems with NICE's severity weights.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2024
Same author

Is there a human right to essential health care?

Developing world bioethics·2022
Same author

Challenge Trials: What Are the Ethical Problems?

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2020
Same author

The Paradoxes of Respectful Guidance: A Comment on Kenneth V. Iserson, "Do you Believe in Magic? Shove, Don't Nudge: Advising Patients at the Bedside".

The Journal of clinical ethics·2020
Same journal

The gendered burden of natural disasters: Evidence from two catastrophic earthquakes in Türkiye.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
Same journal

Epidemiologic approaches to policy research - examinations of single policies, policy clusters, and policy climates: Conceptualization, measurement, and analysis.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
Same journal

Time to check up: Retirement and cancer screening in Australia.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
Same journal

When the platform becomes a co-author: Self-writing about HPV vaccination on social media as technologies of the self.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
Same journal

Eating disorder severity and treatment outcome across race/ethnicity, sexual orientation, and socioeconomic status: Intersectional inequities in a clinical sample.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
Same journal

Syndemic interactions in northwest Italy: education, place of birth, and the co-occurrence of type 2 diabetes and depression.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 10, 2025

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

3.8K

Eliciting preferences and respecting values: Why ask?

Daniel M Hausman1

  • 1Center for Population-Level Bioethics, Rutgers University, USA.

Social Science & Medicine (1982)
|February 11, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Relying on preference elicitation to value health states is flawed. This study argues for valuing health states based on public deliberation regarding activity limitations and suffering, not subjective well-being.

Keywords:
BeliefsPreference elicitationPreferencesPublic deliberationValuing health states

More Related Videos

Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans
12:09

Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans

Published on: March 19, 2014

23.6K
A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

11.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 10, 2025

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

3.8K
Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans
12:09

Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans

Published on: March 19, 2014

23.6K
A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

11.9K

Area of Science:

  • Health economics
  • Public health policy
  • Decision science

Background:

  • Preference elicitation is commonly used to value health states for policy decisions.
  • This method is criticized for its potential ambiguities and fallibility in measuring well-being.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the limitations of preference elicitation in valuing health states.
  • To differentiate preference elicitation from public consultation and deliberation.
  • To propose an alternative framework for valuing health states.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of preference elicitation and public deliberation.
  • Distinguishing between preference elicitation for opinion and for well-being measurement.
  • Argument for valuing health states based on public deliberation outcomes.

Main Results:

  • Preference elicitation is a fallible measure of well-being due to its dependence on beliefs.
  • Public consultation is distinct from preference elicitation and better suited for public deliberation.
  • Valuing health states should focus on activity limitations and suffering, not subjective preferences.

Conclusions:

  • Relying solely on preference elicitation for health state valuation is problematic.
  • Public deliberation offers a more robust method for incorporating societal values into health state valuation.
  • Health state valuation should prioritize objective measures like activity limitations and suffering over subjective preferences.