Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 10, 2025

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Pregnancy Outcomes in Patients Enrolled in the Healthy Beginnings Plus Program
Insights
The Healthy Beginnings Plus Program (HB) did not significantly reduce preterm birth or low birth weight. However, HB participants had more prenatal visits and lower rates of gestational hypertension.
Area of Science:
- Perinatal health
- Public health interventions
- Maternal-child health
Background:
- Low socioeconomic status increases risks for adverse pregnancy outcomes like preterm birth (PTB) and low birth weight (LBW).
- The Healthy Beginnings Plus Program (HB) in Pennsylvania offers enhanced psychosocial and obstetric resources to pregnant individuals with Medical Assistance.
- This program aims to mitigate risks associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of the Healthy Beginnings Plus Program (HB) on key pregnancy outcomes.
- Assessing the impact of HB enrollment on rates of preterm birth and low birth weight neonates.
- Investigating secondary outcomes including gestational diabetes, gestational hypertension, small-for-gestational-age neonates, and NICU admissions.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study including 12,299 singleton pregnancies from January 2007 to December 2018.
- Comparison of three groups: HB-enrolled Medical Assistance, non-enrolled Medical Assistance, and privately insured individuals.
- Primary outcomes: preterm birth (PTB) and low birth weight (LBW) rates. Secondary outcomes: gestational diabetes, gestational hypertension, small-for-gestational-age neonates, and NICU admission.
Main Results:
- No significant differences in PTB or LBW rates were observed between HB-enrolled and non-enrolled Medical Assistance groups.
- HB participants showed a reduced likelihood of developing gestational hypertension compared to both non-enrolled Medical Assistance and privately insured groups.
- Individuals enrolled in HB attended significantly more prenatal visits than those not enrolled (12.0 vs. 14.0, p < .01).
Conclusions:
- The Healthy Beginnings Plus Program did not demonstrate a significant impact on primary outcomes of preterm birth and low birth weight.
- Enrollment in HB was associated with increased prenatal visit attendance and a lower incidence of gestational hypertension.
- Further evaluation of similar programs is recommended to assess outcomes and identify potential areas for improvement.
Objective:
To evaluate the effectiveness of enrollment in the Healthy Beginnings Plus Program (HB) on pregnancy outcomes.
Design:
Retrospective cohort study of 12,299 singleton pregnancies birthed between January 2007 and December 2018.
Setting/Local Problem:
Individuals of low socioeconomic status are at increased risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes, such as preterm birth (PTB) and low-birth-weight (LBW) neonates. Pennsylvania offers HB to pregnant individuals with Medical Assistance insurance to provide additional psychosocial and obstetric resources to routine prenatal care to minimize risk.
Participants:
Individuals with Medical Assistance insurance enrolled in HB (n = 4,645), individuals with Medical Assistance insurance not enrolled in HB (n = 2,874), and individuals with private insurance (n = 4,780).
Measurements:
Primary outcomes were rates of PTB and LBW neonates. Secondary outcomes included rates of gestational diabetes, gestational hypertension, small-for-gestational-age neonates, and admission to the NICU.
Results:
There were no differences in PTB (adjusted OR [aOR] = 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.76, 1.13]) or LBW neonates (aOR = 1.06, 95% CI [0.86, 1.31]) between individuals with Medical Assistance enrolled in HB versus those with Medical Assistance insurance not enrolled in HB. Individuals with Medical Assistance enrolled in HB were less likely to develop gestational hypertension compared to individuals with Medical Assistance insurance not enrolled in HB (aOR = 1.41, 95% CI [1.25, 1.59]) and individuals with private insurance (aOR = 0.85, 95% CI [0.76, 0.96]). They also attended more prenatal visits than individuals with Medical Assistance insurance not enrolled in HB (12.0 vs. 14.0, p < .01).
Conclusion:
Although there was no significant difference between groups for the primary outcomes studied, individuals with Medical Assistance insurance enrolled in HB attended more prenatal visits than those who did not enroll in HB. Similar programs should evaluate outcomes and consider whether changes are needed.
More Related Videos
03:01Author Spotlight: A Reproductive Hysteroscopy Approach for Complete Endometrial Polyp Removal and Enhanced Endometrial Receptivity
Published on: August 2, 2024
05:33Author Spotlight: Alleviating Nausea and Vomiting in Pregnancy with Safe and Effective Auricular Acupuncture
Published on: August 4, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Pathophysiology of Diabetes
Type 1 diabetes is characterized by autoimmune-mediated destruction of pancreatic β cells, with environmental factors potentially triggering this process in genetically susceptible individuals. Despite many not having a family history, certain genes increase susceptibility,...
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
Teratogenicity
Infertility in Females
Endometriosis, a condition characterized by abnormal growth of...
Regression Toward the Mean