Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 10, 2025

05:30
Surgical Approach and Complications of Stand-alone Lateral Trans-Psoas Interbody Fusion
Published on: February 14, 2025
932
Risk of Recall for Total Joint Arthroplasty Devices Over 10 Years
Matthew T DeRuyter1, LeiLani N Mansy1, John W Krumme1
1University of Missouri, Kansas City, Missouri.
The Journal of Arthroplasty
|February 11, 2023
Summary
Orthopaedic arthroplasty devices approved via the Food and Drug Administration's 510(k) pathway have a higher recall risk than previously understood, with approximately 24% recalled within 10 years. Process control and device design were the primary reasons for these recalls.
Area of Science:
- Orthopaedic surgery
- Medical device regulation
- Biomedical engineering
Background:
- Orthopaedic devices represent nearly 20% of medical devices, with 12-20% recalled within 10 years.
- Over 95% of these devices are approved via the Food and Drug Administration's 510(k) pathway without clinical data.
- The recall risk for orthopaedic arthroplasty devices specifically, approved through the 510(k) pathway, has not been previously studied.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the recall risk of orthopaedic arthroplasty devices approved through the Food and Drug Administration's 510(k) pathway.
- To compare the recall risk between hip and knee arthroplasty devices.
- To identify common reasons for arthroplasty device recalls.
Main Methods:
- Querying the Food and Drug Administration 510(k) database for orthopaedic devices approved between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2018.
- Classifying devices into hip and knee arthroplasty using product codes.
- Analyzing recall data, including numbers, dates, and reasons, and employing cumulative incidence function to compare recall risks.
Main Results:
- A total of 904 arthroplasty devices were included: 485 hip (53.7%) and 419 knee (46.3%).
- Recall rates were 19.4% for hip and 20.3% for knee devices.
- The 10-year recall hazard was approximately 24% for both hip and knee arthroplasty devices, with no statistical difference. Process control (29.6%) and device design (26.3%) were the most frequent recall causes.
Conclusions:
- The recall risk for arthroplasty devices is higher than previously recognized.
- Enhanced postmarket surveillance strategies are crucial for patient safety.
- Increased physician involvement in detecting and reporting device safety issues is necessary.

