Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 10, 2025

An Intact Pericardium Ischemic Rodent Model
Published on: September 2, 2021
Chronic Pericardial Effusion: Causes and Management
George Lazaros1, Massimo Imazio2, Panagiotis Tsioufis1
1First Cardiology Clinic, Hippokration General Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Abstract:
Chronic pericardial effusion is a common pericardial syndrome whose approach has been well standardised in recent years. The main challenge associated with this condition is the progression (sometimes unheralded) to cardiac tamponade. Pericardial effusions may present either as an isolated finding or in the context of a specific etiology including autoimmune, neoplastic, or metabolic disease. Among investigations used during diagnostic work-up, echocardiography is of paramount importance for the diagnosis, sizing, and serial evaluation of the hemodynamic impact of effusions on heart diastolic function. In an individualised manner, advanced imaging including computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging should be performed, especially if baseline tests are inconclusive. Triage of these patients according to the most recent 2015 European Society of Cardiology Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of pericardial diseases should take into account the presence of hemodynamic compromise as well as suspicion of malignant or purulent pericarditis as first step, C-reactive protein serum level measurement as second step, investigations for a specific condition known to be associated with pericardial effusion as third step, and finally the size and the duration of the effusion. Treatment depends on the evaluation of the above-mentioned parameters and should ideally be tailored to the individual patient. Prognosis of chronic pericardial effusions depends largely on the underlying etiology. According to novel data, the prognosis of individuals with idiopathic, chronic (> 3 months), large (> 2 cm), asymptomatic pericardial effusions is usually benign and a watchful waiting strategy seems more reasonable and cost-effective than routine drainage as previously recommended.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Pericarditis III: Medical Management
Pericarditis IV: Nursing Management
Pericarditis I: Introduction
Pericarditis II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Myocarditis III: Medical Management

