Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons02:54

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

6.0K
Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...
6.0K
Phylogenetic Trees03:21

Phylogenetic Trees

45.8K
Phylogenetic trees come in many forms. It matters in which sequence the organisms are arranged from the bottom to the top of the tree, but the branches can rotate at their nodes without altering the information. The lines connecting individual nodes can be straight, angled, or even curved.
45.8K
Phylogeny01:23

Phylogeny

45.0K
Phylogeny is concerned with the evolutionary diversification of organisms or groups of organisms. A group of organisms with a name is called a taxon (singular). Taxa (plural) can span different levels of the evolutionary hierarchy. For instance, the group containing all birds is a taxon (comprising the class Aves), and the group of all species of daisies (the genus Bellis) is a taxon. Phylogenies can likewise include just one genus (i.e., depict species relationships) or span an entire kingdom.
45.0K
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?02:05

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

7.2K
The genomes of eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of sequence which do not code for proteins or RNAs. Although some of these regions do contain crucial regulatory sequences, the vast majority of this DNA serves no known function. Typically, these regions of the genome are the ones in which the fastest change, in evolutionary terms, is observed, because there is typically little to no selection pressure acting on these regions to preserve their sequences.
In contrast, regions which code...
7.2K
Modern Molecular Taxonomy01:29

Modern Molecular Taxonomy

71
Advancements in molecular biology have revolutionized the identification and characterization of bacteria, with multiple methods leveraging DNA sequencing for enhanced precision. As sequencing technologies improve and costs decline, these approaches are increasingly used in clinical, environmental, and evolutionary studies.Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST) examines several housekeeping genes, essential chromosomal genes encoding cellular functions, to distinguish strains. Approximately...
71
Comparing Mitochondrial, Chloroplast, and Prokaryotic Genomes02:16

Comparing Mitochondrial, Chloroplast, and Prokaryotic Genomes

12.6K
The present-day mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes have retained some of the characteristics of their ancestral prokaryotes and also have acquired new attributes during their evolution within eukaryotic cells. Like prokaryotic genomes, mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes neither bind with histone-like proteins nor show complex packaging into chromosome-like structures, as observed in eukaryotes. Unlike mitotic cell divisions observed in eukaryotic cells, mitochondria and chloroplasts...
12.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparative evaluation of traditional versus generative AI patient education material on prehabilitation.

Journal of perioperative practice·2026
Same author

Caudal Anesthesia Patient Education Materials: Comprehensive Analysis of Generative Artificial Intelligence and Traditional Patient Information Leaflets.

Paediatric anaesthesia·2026
Same author

Lithium Ion-Conducting Triazacoronene-Based Neutral 2D Covalent Organic Framework as a Solid-State Electrolyte.

Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)·2026
Same author

A New Alignment-Free Approach to Compare Protein Secondary Structure Families Through SSEs.

IEEE transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics·2026
Same author

PolyA-GLM: A comprehensive framework for <i>De novo</i> polyadenylation site prediction using genome language models.

Computational and structural biotechnology journal·2026
Same author

Dual Electronic and Li<sup>+</sup> Ion Conducting Ytterbium-Hexaazatrinaphthalene Metal-Organic Framework and Its Carbon Nanotube Composites.

ACS nano·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 10, 2025

Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin
08:57

Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin

Published on: August 14, 2018

16.0K

PTGAC Model: A machine learning approach for constructing phylogenetic tree to compare protein sequences.

Jayanta Pal1,2, Sourav Saha2, Bansibadan Maji1

  • 1Department of ECE, National Institute of Technology, Durgapur, West Bengal 713209, India.

Journal of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology
|February 12, 2023
PubMed
Summary

A new machine learning model for phylogenetic tree generation (PTGAC) efficiently compares protein sequences using amino acid chemical properties. This method offers a faster, more accurate alternative to traditional techniques like UPGMA.

Keywords:
Agglomerative clusteringTP valueUPGMAmachine learningmoment vectorprincipal component analysis

More Related Videos

A Concoction Pipeline for Generating Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units (MOTUs) Among Riparian and Aquatic Beetles
10:23

A Concoction Pipeline for Generating Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units (MOTUs) Among Riparian and Aquatic Beetles

Published on: July 11, 2025

161
Creating and Applying a Reference to Facilitate the Discussion and Classification of Proteins in a Diverse Group
07:49

Creating and Applying a Reference to Facilitate the Discussion and Classification of Proteins in a Diverse Group

Published on: August 16, 2017

7.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 10, 2025

Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin
08:57

Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin

Published on: August 14, 2018

16.0K
A Concoction Pipeline for Generating Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units (MOTUs) Among Riparian and Aquatic Beetles
10:23

A Concoction Pipeline for Generating Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units (MOTUs) Among Riparian and Aquatic Beetles

Published on: July 11, 2025

161
Creating and Applying a Reference to Facilitate the Discussion and Classification of Proteins in a Diverse Group
07:49

Creating and Applying a Reference to Facilitate the Discussion and Classification of Proteins in a Diverse Group

Published on: August 16, 2017

7.1K

Area of Science:

  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • Traditional phylogenetic tree construction methods, such as the Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic Mean (UPGMA), are computationally intensive.
  • Accurate phylogenetic analysis requires considering the complex chemical properties of amino acids.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a novel machine learning-based phylogenetic tree generation model (PTGAC) utilizing agglomerative clustering.
  • To provide a computationally efficient and accurate alternative for protein sequence comparison.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to reduce the dimensionality of amino acid chemical properties.
  • Developed a novel three-component vector descriptor based on non-central moments.
  • Employed Euclidean Distance and hierarchical agglomerative clustering to construct phylogenetic trees.
  • Compared PTGAC performance against UPGMA and other methods using qualitative (rationalized perception) and quantitative (symmetric distance) analyses.

Main Results:

  • The proposed PTGAC model demonstrated superior performance compared to existing methods in both qualitative and quantitative analyses.
  • PTGAC achieved more satisfactory phylogenetic tree construction in terms of accuracy and efficiency.
  • The model effectively handles protein sequences of varying lengths, showcasing its robustness.

Conclusions:

  • The machine learning-based PTGAC model offers a significant advancement in phylogenetic tree generation.
  • PTGAC provides an efficient and accurate alternative for analyzing protein sequence evolution.
  • The model's ability to incorporate chemical properties enhances the reliability of phylogenetic inferences.