Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 10, 2025

Remote Laboratory Management: Respiratory Virus Diagnostics
Published on: April 6, 2019
Uncertainty, scarcity and transparency: Public health ethics and risk communication in a pandemic
Abigail E Lowe1, Teck Chuan Voo2, Lisa M Lee3
1Global Center for Health Security, College of Allied Health Professions, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Abstract:
Communicating public health guidance is key to mitigating risk during disasters and outbreaks, and ethical guidance on communication emphasizes being fully transparent. Yet, communication during the pandemic has sometimes been fraught, due in part to practical and conceptual challenges around being transparent. A particular challenge has arisen when there was both evolving scientific knowledge on COVID-19 and reticence to acknowledge that resource scarcity concerns were influencing public health recommendations. This essay uses the example of communicating public health guidance on masking in the United States to illustrate ethical challenges of developing and conveying public health guidance under twin conditions of uncertainty and resource scarcity. Such situations require balancing two key principles in public health ethics: the precautionary principle and harm reduction. Transparency remains a bedrock value to guide risk communication, but optimizing transparency requires consideration of additional ethical values in developing and implementing risk communication strategies.
Related Concept Videos
Ethics and Bioethics
Steps in Outbreak Investigation
Ethical Dilemmas II
Ethical Dilemmas I
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...
Principles of Disease Surveillance
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...

