Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A randomised, prospective study comparing two contrast media in ERCP.

W J Cunliffe1, I Cobden, M I Lavelle

  • 1Department of Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, U.K.

Endoscopy
|September 1, 1987
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Percutaneous biliary stone clearance: is there still a need? A 10-year single-centre experience.

Clinical radiology·2021
Same author

Advanced pre-hospital critical care and outcome after major injury: present and future.

Anaesthesia·2021
Same author

Respiratory-aspirated 35-mm hairpin successfully retrieved with a Teflon® snare system under fluoroscopic guidance via a split endotracheal tube: a useful technique in cases of failed extraction by bronchoscopy and avoiding the need for a thoracotomy.

The British journal of radiology·2012
Same author

Evaluation of hepatic angiography procedures and bremsstrahlung imaging in selective internal radiation therapy: a two-year single-center experience.

Cardiovascular and interventional radiology·2008
Same author

The effect of unselected post-operative nutritional supplementation on nutritional status and clinical outcome of orthopaedic patients.

Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland)·2003
Same author

Patterns of lung disease in a "normal" smoking population: are emphysema and airflow obstruction found together?

Chest·2001
Same journal

Correction: A novel technique for endoscopic stepwise clamping and resection of giant pedunculated colonic polyps.

Endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Feasibility and safety of an adaptive endoscopic resection algorithm guided by the muscle-retracting sign for early rectal cancer.

Endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Is ERCP losing its dominance to endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage for malignant distal biliary obstruction?

Endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage for distal malignant biliary obstruction: It's not the tool - but knowing which one to use!

Endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Endoscopic closure of a large gastric mucosal defect using a novel endoscopic suturing device in a porcine model.

Endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Anchor clip-assisted detachable loop ligation for definitive hemostasis and closure of a high-risk bleeding gastric ulcer.

Endoscopy·2026
See all related articles

This study compared two contrast media for ERCP procedures. Hexabrix (Meglumine/Sodium Ioxaglate) showed a lower incidence of pancreatitis compared to Urografin (Meglumine/Sodium Diatrizoate), suggesting it is a safer option.

Area of Science:

  • Gastroenterology
  • Radiology
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP) is a crucial diagnostic and therapeutic procedure.
  • The choice of contrast media can influence patient outcomes, particularly post-ERCP pancreatitis.
  • Evaluating the safety and efficacy of different contrast agents is essential for optimizing ERCP protocols.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the safety and efficacy of Meglumine/Sodium Ioxaglate (Hexabrix 320) versus Meglumine/Sodium Diatrizoate (Urografin 310) in ERCP.
  • To assess the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis associated with each contrast medium.
  • To evaluate the quality of radiographic imaging achieved with both contrast agents.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized, prospective, stratified, double-blind study design.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Inclusion of 94 patients undergoing ERCP, divided into two groups receiving either Hexabrix 320 or Urografin 310.
  • Independent assessment of radiographic quality by two radiologists.

    • Main Results:

    • No significant difference in radiographic quality was observed between Hexabrix 320 and Urografin 310.
    • A higher incidence of pancreatitis was noted in patients who received Urografin 310.
    • Patient demographics (age, sex) and diagnoses were evenly matched between the two groups.

    Conclusions:

    • Meglumine/Sodium Ioxaglate (Hexabrix 320) appears to be a safer contrast medium for ERCP compared to Meglumine/Sodium Diatrizoate (Urografin 310).
    • The findings suggest that Hexabrix 320 may reduce the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis.
    • Further research may be warranted to confirm the safety profile of Hexabrix 320 in a larger patient cohort.