Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cognitive Development During Adolescence01:18

Cognitive Development During Adolescence

94
During adolescence, individuals experience significant cognitive development that enhances their understanding of others' emotions and thoughts, known as cognitive empathy. This period is marked by an increased ability to adapt to others' perspectives and a more nuanced understanding of others' mental states, a skill that is foundational for social problem-solving and conflict avoidance. The development of cognitive empathy relies heavily on the theory of mind — the...
94
Socioemotional Experience and Gender Development01:30

Socioemotional Experience and Gender Development

59
Social-emotional experiences and cultural influences play significant roles in shaping gender development. During middle childhood, from ages 6 to 11, peer groups become dominant in reinforcing gender norms. Children in this age group often align with same-gender peer groups, which actively encourage behaviors that conform to traditional gender roles. For instance, boys may be discouraged from engaging in activities perceived as feminine, reinforcing culturally dictated norms about masculinity...
59
Piaget's Stage 2 of Cognitive Development01:14

Piaget's Stage 2 of Cognitive Development

134
The preoperational stage, the second of Jean Piaget's four stages of cognitive development, spans approximately ages 2 to 7 and is characterized by the emergence of symbolic thinking. During this stage, children use language, images, and symbols to represent objects and concepts, enabling them to engage in imaginative and pretend play. This symbolic thinking supports children's ability to perform make-believe actions, such as imagining a broom as a horse or their hand as a phone, blending...
134
Piaget's Stage 3 of Cognitive Development01:17

Piaget's Stage 3 of Cognitive Development

612
During Piaget's concrete operational stage, from ages 7 to 11, children exhibit a marked increase in logical thinking skills, specifically in relation to tangible, real-world events. This stage is characterized by the development of several essential cognitive concepts, including conservation, reversibility, and classification, all of which support the child's evolving capacity for structured thought.
Conservation and Constancy of Quantity
A significant cognitive milestone in the...
612
Piaget's Stage 4 of Cognitive Development01:19

Piaget's Stage 4 of Cognitive Development

105
The formal operational stage, as described in Piaget's cognitive development theory, begins around age 11 and extends into adulthood. It marks the emergence of advanced cognitive abilities that differentiate adolescent and adult thinking from those of younger children. This stage is characterized by abstract reasoning, hypothetical-deductive reasoning, and a more complex understanding of self and others.
Abstract Reasoning and Hypothetical-Deductive Thinking
Unlike the concrete operational...
105
Facial Feedback Hypothesis01:24

Facial Feedback Hypothesis

225
Charles Darwin proposed that facial expressions are an evolutionary adaptation for communication. He argued that these expressions are not influenced by culture but are universal across species. For example, a snarling expression with exposed teeth signals a threat in many animals, including humans. Darwin also suggested that displaying an emotion can intensify the feeling. Smiling, for example, could enhance one's sense of happiness. This idea laid the foundation for understanding the role...
225

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Navigating false positive HIV test results: a case report.

ASM case reports·2025
Same author

Abstracts of the 26th International Workshop on Clinical Pharmacology of HIV, Hepatitis and other Antiviral Drugs 2025, 3-4 September 2025, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

British journal of clinical pharmacology·2025
Same author

Exploring light-emitting diode pumped luminescent concentrators in solid-state laser applications.

Methods and applications in fluorescence·2024
Same author

The feasibility and impact of implementing a computer-guided consultation to target health inequality in Asthma.

NPJ primary care respiratory medicine·2023
Same author

A systematic review of point-of-care abdominal ultrasound scans performed by general surgeons in paediatric patients.

The surgeon : journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland·2023
Same author

Correction: In-silico analysis of interacting pathways through KIM-1 protein interaction in diabetic nephropathy.

BMC nephrology·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 10, 2025

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

17.4K

Manipulating avatar age and gender in level-2 visual perspective taking.

B Ford1, R Monk2, D Litchfield2

  • 1Department of Psychology, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, Lancashire, UK. 24344478@edgehill.ac.uk.

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|February 13, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Avatar age and gender influence visual perspective taking (VPT) performance. This suggests general group categorization, not specific outgroup deficits, impacts spatial judgments.

Keywords:
Avatar characteristicsSocial cuesSpatial processingVisual perspective taking

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Neurorehabilitation Through EEG, Motor Imagery, and Virtual Reality
10:14

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Neurorehabilitation Through EEG, Motor Imagery, and Virtual Reality

Published on: May 10, 2024

1.1K
Creating Virtual-hand and Virtual-face Illusions to Investigate Self-representation
06:53

Creating Virtual-hand and Virtual-face Illusions to Investigate Self-representation

Published on: March 1, 2017

13.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 10, 2025

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

17.4K
Author Spotlight: Enhancing Neurorehabilitation Through EEG, Motor Imagery, and Virtual Reality
10:14

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Neurorehabilitation Through EEG, Motor Imagery, and Virtual Reality

Published on: May 10, 2024

1.1K
Creating Virtual-hand and Virtual-face Illusions to Investigate Self-representation
06:53

Creating Virtual-hand and Virtual-face Illusions to Investigate Self-representation

Published on: March 1, 2017

13.3K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Social Neuroscience
  • Visuospatial Cognition

Background:

  • Visual perspective taking (VPT) assesses understanding from another's viewpoint.
  • Previous studies show social factors like age and emotion influence VPT, but often confound social and spatial measures.
  • The impact of avatar characteristics on VPT, particularly concerning general group processing versus specific outgroup deficits, remains unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if avatar age and gender affect performance on simple and complex visual perspective judgments.
  • To differentiate the influence of social categorization from specific mentalizing deficits in VPT.
  • To utilize a minimally social task to isolate spatial computations from social reasoning.

Main Methods:

  • Ninety-two participants performed a visual perspective taking task involving avatars of different ages and genders (boy, girl, man, woman).
  • Avatars were presented at varying angular disparities, with a target object positioned relative to the avatar.
  • Participants indicated the object's orientation from the avatar's perspective, assessing performance across low and high angular disparities.

Main Results:

  • Avatar age and gender significantly affected visuospatial perspective taking (VSPT) performance.
  • Performance varied based on the complexity of the spatial judgment (angular disparity).
  • Social features influencing VSPT appear processed independently from core spatial computations.

Conclusions:

  • General group categorization (age, gender) influences Level-2 VSPT.
  • The findings suggest VSPT is affected by broad social categorization rather than specific deficits in mentalizing about outgroups like children.
  • Spatial and social components of VSPT are separable cognitive processes.