Evaluation of computed tomography perfusion and angiogram use in stroke evaluation for thrombectomy at a community

Cal D Zahn1, Hayden L Smith2, Jonathan R Hurdelbrink2,3

  • 1Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.

Emergency Radiology
|February 13, 2023
PubMed

Insights

This study evaluated computed tomography perfusion and angiogram (CT-P/A) use for thrombectomy screening. Results show variations in treatment decisions, particularly for patients not meeting strict clinical criteria, highlighting the need for further research.

Area of Science:

  • Neurology
  • Radiology
  • Emergency Medicine

Background:

  • Mechanical thrombectomy has improved outcomes for acute ischemic stroke.
  • Clinical guidelines (DAWN, DEFUSE-3) dictate patient selection for thrombectomy.
  • Computed tomography perfusion and angiogram (CT-P/A) is a key diagnostic tool for stroke assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess adherence to clinical guidelines for thrombectomy screening using CT-P/A in an emergency department setting.
  • To evaluate the utilization of CT-P/A in stroke patients presenting to the emergency department.
  • To analyze treatment decisions based on CT-P/A findings in relation to established thrombectomy criteria.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective observational study of adult patients undergoing CT-P/A in a US Midwestern emergency department (September 2019 - June 2021).
  • Review of healthcare system records for patient demographics, CT-P/A results, and subsequent treatment decisions.
  • Analysis of patient cohorts based on meeting or not meeting DAWN and DEFUSE-3 criteria for thrombectomy.

Main Results:

  • Out of 68,403 ED visits, 718 (1.1%) received a CT-P/A.
  • 105 patients were transferred for potential thrombectomy; 74 received the procedure.
  • Patients meeting DAWN criteria had higher transfer (91.3%) and procedure (95.2%) rates compared to those not meeting criteria (64.2% procedure rate).
  • Similarly, patients meeting DEFUSE-3 criteria had higher transfer (89.1%) and procedure (91.8%) rates compared to those not meeting criteria (50.9% procedure rate).

Conclusions:

  • CT-P/A is utilized in emergency departments for stroke assessment, including in patients outside established thrombectomy criteria.
  • Observed variations in treatment decisions suggest a need to refine the application of CT-P/A in stroke care.
  • Findings provide insights for institutions evaluating or implementing CT-P/A for stroke assessment and thrombectomy workup.
Abstract