Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 10, 2025

External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?
Published on: June 6, 2020
Interventions to reintroduce or increase assisted vaginal births: a systematic review of the literature
Maria Regina Torloni1, Newton Opiyo2, Elena Altieri3
1Department of Medicine, Evidence Based Healthcare Post-Graduate Program, Sao Paulo Federal University, Sao Paulo, Brazil torlonimr@gmail.com.
Objective:
To synthesise the evidence from studies that implemented interventions to increase/reintroduce the use of assisted vaginal births (AVB).
Design:
Systematic review.
Eligibility Criteria:
We included experimental, semi-experimental and observational studies that reported any intervention to reintroduce/increase AVB use.
Data Sources:
We searched PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, LILACS, Scopus, Cochrane, WHO Library, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO.int/ictrp through September 2021.
Risk Of Bias:
For trials, we used the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care tool; for other designs we used Risk of Bias for Non-Randomised Studies of Interventions.
Data Extraction And Synthesis:
Due to heterogeneity in interventions, we did not conduct meta-analyses. We present data descriptively, grouping studies according to settings: high-income countries (HICs) or low/middle-income countries (LMICs). We classified direction of intervention effects as (a) statistically significant increase or decrease, (b) no statistically significant change or (c) statistical significance not reported in primary study. We provide qualitative syntheses of the main barriers and enablers for success of the intervention.
Results:
We included 16 studies (10 from LMICs), mostly of low or moderate methodological quality, which described interventions with various components (eg, didactic sessions, simulation, hands-on training, guidelines, audit/feedback). All HICs studies described isolated initiatives to increase AVB use; 9/10 LMIC studies tested initiatives to increase AVB use as part of larger multicomponent interventions to improve maternal/perinatal healthcare. No study assessed women's views or designed interventions using behavioural theories. Overall, interventions were less successful in LMICs than in HICs. Increase in AVB use was not associated with significant increase in adverse maternal or perinatal outcomes. The main barriers to the successful implementation of the initiatives were related to staff and hospital environment.
Conclusions:
There is insufficient evidence to indicate which intervention, or combination of interventions, is more effective to safely increase AVB use. More research is needed, especially in LMICs, including studies that design interventions taking into account theories of behaviour change.
Prospero Registration Number:
CRD42020215224.
More Related Videos
07:11Assessment of the Efficacy of An Osteopathic Treatment in Infants with Biomechanical Impairments to Suckling
Published on: February 5, 2019
05:46Introduction of Intracapsular Rotary-cut Procedures IRCP: A Modified Hysteromyomectomy Procedures Facilitating Fertility Preservation
Published on: January 17, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions
Nursing Interventions I: Taxonomy of Nursing Interventions
A nursing intervention is a treatment or action based on scientific concepts and knowledge from the nursing, behavioral, and physical sciences. Identifying and prioritizing nursing interventions based on the desired outcome...
In Vitro Fertilization
The IVF process begins with ovarian stimulation, during which reproductive endocrinologists prescribe hormonal medications to stimulate the ovaries to produce multiple eggs instead of the single...
Varicose Veins II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation V: Advanced Airway Management Techniques
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management